No one can tell me the truth bout short shifters..
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu...=646827029&n=2
That's a vid of what it was doing, and how "slow" it get's up.
And its a whole short shifter, not just an adapter
That's a vid of what it was doing, and how "slow" it get's up.
And its a whole short shifter, not just an adapter
You are shifting way too fast and hard and your synchros can't go that fast. It's definitely not the short shifter. It will do that even with a stock shifter (I Know) if you shift too hard and do it quite often.
Originally Posted by Lester
You are shifting way too fast and hard and your synchros can't go that fast. It's definitely not the short shifter. It will do that even with a stock shifter (I Know) if you shift too hard and do it quite often.
Yeah, just take it easy. I used to do it a lot when I first got my car and got short shifter which I broke by shifting too hard into 3rd (Ebay pos). I put the stock shifter back on and when I shift kinda fast, it makes that noise, but not as bad.
Originally Posted by Lester
Yeah, just take it easy. I used to do it a lot when I first got my car and got short shifter which I broke by shifting too hard into 3rd (Ebay pos). I put the stock shifter back on and when I shift kinda fast, it makes that noise, but not as bad.
I have a B16 with a GS-R tranny, short shifter and never had a problem.
Had a 93 Prelude Si w/o short shifter and third gear was grinding at high rpm's like a mofo.
Had a 93 Prelude Si w/o short shifter and third gear was grinding at high rpm's like a mofo.
Originally Posted by MORE IMPATIENT
according to many people short shifters fuck your tranny up by putting the car in gear before its supposed to , my argument is, how the fuck did they determine when the car is supposed to go into gear, that kinda doesnt make any sense to me, shifting at an rpm is shifting at an rpm, although i do understand why they say it because of the shorter distance to the gear it can wear the synchros and teeth out prematurely and the added torque load on the main shaft because the engine didnt have time to drop rpm to reduce the speed and load on the gear, but if you shift at 6k rpm with a stock shifter and lets say it catches at 5.5k rpm, how much of a difference is that if your shifting at 6krpm with a short shifter and it catches at 5.7k rpm, is that slight difference in time and torque load really going to make a difference, maybe over a long period of time i guess it could.and the argument that short shifters force the car into gear instead of letting the syncrhos do there job of easing transition of the change but i cant argue with that cause that makes sense, all i know is ive use a short shifter in every car ive ever had and never had a problem, they have all be b&m short shifters so i think ill stick with that and hopefully the problem stays away,ha.




