S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
http://www.sscautos.com/specifications.asp
the only thing I find weird is they say times and speed are calculated using g-tech AHAHAHAHA!!! fags!! but still nice :D |
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
who actually builds the motor? any paticular manufaturer that we would know of?
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
damn thats one liiggghhhtttt car. i'd be afraid to drive it for the simple fact that a strong gust of wind would probably launch me into the air lol
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by leolo007
http://www.sscautos.com/specifications.asp
the only thing I find weird is they say times and speed are calculated using g-tech AHAHAHAHA!!! fags!! but still nice :D |
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by AWishForWings
damn thats one liiggghhhtttt car. i'd be afraid to drive it for the simple fact that a strong gust of wind would probably launch me into the air lol
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
i say GoDAYUM
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
for pure numbers of an exotic or supercar, the coefficient of drag is kinda high...that'll hurt the top speed
I really like the car except for the front end...I'm picky |
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by AWishForWings
damn thats one liiggghhhtttt car. i'd be afraid to drive it for the simple fact that a strong gust of wind would probably launch me into the air lol
Originally Posted by BLACKTURBOS2K
That didnt beat the S2K. The S2K motor makes the most Hp per Lt of ANY mass produced car. Its 120hp per Lt. They have the Rec. for the most Hp per Lbs. Go back and look at a little better
Displacement: 378 cu.in./6187cc Horsepower: 908 bhp @ 6600 rpm 6187cc approximately 6.2Lt 908hp/6.2Lt = 146hp/Lt there's your map ;) the only thing I still admire about the S2K is that it doesnt need 14psi of assistance :cool:
Originally Posted by Victum
its not that light... i think u looked at the motor weight...
Body/Frame: Carbon Fiber/Composite/Steel Space Frame :cool:
Originally Posted by Homemade WRX
for pure numbers of an exotic or supercar, the coefficient of drag is kinda high...that'll hurt the top speed
I really like the car except for the front end...I'm picky hey man, I remember meeting you once at an autocross event. I told you I had the jdm ej20t. I almost had it sold to some dude but he said it tried putting a 2002 wrx engine and it was a "no go" as he put it. Im not sure what or why it didnt fit. Im sure you know more about what year engine fits what year car, and tranny, he has a 2.2lt right now. If you know, or can link a site, send me a pm. thanks!! |
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by Victum
its not that light... i think u looked at the motor weight...
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
[
need a map?? Displacement: 378 cu.in./6187cc Horsepower: 908 bhp @ 6600 rpm 6187cc approximately 6.2Lt 908hp/6.2Lt = 146hp/Lt there's your map ;) the only thing I still admire about the S2K is that it doesnt need 14psi of assistance :cool: Ill say it one more time the S2K has the MOST Hp per Lt of any N/A car in the world. Remember, This is N/A!!! |
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by BLACKTURBOS2K
Ill say it one more time the S2K has the MOST Hp per Lt of any N/A car in the world. Remember, This is N/A!!! |
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by leolo007
hey man, I remember meeting you once at an autocross event. I told you I had the jdm ej20t. I almost had it sold to some dude but he said it tried putting a 2002 wrx engine and it was a "no go" as he put it. Im not sure what or why it didnt fit. Im sure you know more about what year engine fits what year car, and tranny, he has a 2.2lt right now. If you know, or can link a site, send me a pm. thanks!!
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by BLACKTURBOS2K
the only thing I still admire about the S2K is that it doesnt need 14psi of assistance :cool:
Ill say it one more time the S2K has the MOST Hp per Lt of any N/A car in the world. Remember, This is N/A!!! |
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Ouch :(
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
900hp in a 2700# car and only a 10.44? Learn to drive bitches!
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by TheGoaT
900hp in a 2700# car and only a 10.44? Learn to drive bitches!
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
If this car did beat the S2K in hp/liter production engine, the msrp for this thing is $249,900!!! i dont think you can compare a $30K S2000 with this.
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Beast. :thup:
An S2K doesn't belong in the line-up with one of these, or even be mentioned in the same thread. DIE YOUNG BIATCH. |
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
damn, all the s2k haters. Fuck a s2k, yeah thats right i said it!!
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
pimp...ass...headers.
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by MP5
damn, all the s2k haters. Fuck a s2k, yeah thats right i said it!!
Fuck aS2K? Fuck a P.O.S Civic. Come up here and see what a S2K with 20lbs of boost can do. ;) I see that you have a S2K, thats funny |
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by leolo007
uuuuuh nice editing work!!! "I'll say it again" hahahah what a fag, I had heard S2K owners were cocky bitches but your the first one I meet... fag
Let me guess, You have some P.O.S. car and you are SO Hard. P/C thug? Maby you should know who you are talking to before you go calling people fags. That some real dumb shit, do you fell better about yourself? All that you need to know is that you are wrong and that you dont know what the fuck you are talking about. Dont talk shit when you cant back your ass up. Just to let you know I do have a turboed S2K and it does run 20lbs of boost. Fucking FAG :fu: |
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by BLACKTURBOS2K
Come up here and see what a S2K with 20lbs of boost can do. ;)
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by DiveRseAsyn
If this car did beat the S2K in hp/liter production engine, the msrp for this thing is $249,900!!! i dont think you can compare a $30K S2000 with this.
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
aren't they only talking N/A?
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
I would think they would only be comparing N/A vs N/A
it doesn't take a super Engineer to figure out you can make more HP/ci with a power adder than on straight compression and crazy rpm's |
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
F series S2K engines are topped out when it comes to N/A performace so you have to add boost. S2k are nice cars but they are not gods answer to cars.
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by BLACKTURBOS2K
Let me guess, You have some P.O.S. car and you are SO Hard. P/C thug? Maby you should know who you are talking to before you go calling people fags. That some real dumb shit, do you fell better about yourself? All that you need to know is that you are wrong and that you dont know what the fuck you are talking about. Dont talk shit when you cant back your ass up.
Just to let you know I do have a turboed S2K and it does run 20lbs of boost. Fucking FAG :fu:
Originally Posted by leolo007
I had heard S2K owners were cocky bitches but your the first one I meet... FAG
"That didnt beat the S2K. The S2K motor makes the most Hp per Lt of ANY mass produced car. Its 120hp per Lt. They have the Rec. for the most Hp per Lbs. Go back and look at a little better" then when I shut your little pie hole with "the map" you go back do some little editing and change your post ( Last edited by BLACKTURBOS2K : 10-26-2004 at 06:36 PM. ), add N/A and then come back and reply as if I was an idiot and didnt read you post correctly the first time. HAHAHHA and just keep posting man, you are some funny faggot :moon: by the way, to the rest of the people replying here who are actually civilized. your right, the s2k is no challenge for this car, its turbo, much bigger displacement, and much mor expensive. But the truth is, as far as I remember the s2k had most hp/liter of any car turbo or n/a, now its just n/a ;)
Originally Posted by Homemade WRX
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII MR FQ-400 is a 2.0L with 405 bhp...or is suppose to be, no doesn't that beat both of these cars? of course it is about $80k
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
damn I need one right now
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
I said god damn
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
yeah, I know na to na but couldn't help but throw in a 4-banger that does 0-60 in 3.5 stock
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by TheGoaT
lose?
I may lose to something but I bet it wont be to your truck ;) |
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
hahahaha...all this hp per liter bs is lame...excuses ppl with small motors,little horsepower,and even smaller amount of torque.a s2000 has more hp per liter than my car too...but i bet i'd finish the 1/4 before ANY s2000 around here finishes the 1/8th.
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by BLACKTURBOS2K
I may lose to something but I bet it wont be to your truck ;)
congrats on a 11 sec s2k since thats what your claiming you have |
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
from all the hooked up S2k's I see in magazines making 300+ whp they don't show much improvement in times of acceleration...
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by Homemade WRX
isn't he saying he won't beat your truck....?
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by TheGoaT
read it again, he said he wouldnt lose.
|
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by Homemade WRX
from all the hooked up S2k's I see in magazines making 300+ whp they don't show much improvement in times of acceleration...
A Mid 14 is good for a stock s2k I ran a 12.5 with 319rwhp and stock tires. I made 430rwhp with a blow headgasket and a bad piston. The car will be around a 11.5 easy with good tires. Did you ever see the vid with the turbo s2k? That was my car. I ran a 12.2 @ 119mph with Kumhos when I had the bad gasket. Iam going to put bigger Inj. in and a EMS. The turbo should be good for 28-32lbs, That will be good for well over 550rwhp. The motor is not stock. I have Wiseco pistons, AEBS sleeves, and Eagle rods. |
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by gyl
hahahaha...all this hp per liter bs is lame...excuses ppl with small motors,little horsepower,and even smaller amount of torque.a s2000 has more hp per liter than my car too...but i bet i'd finish the 1/4 before ANY s2000 around here finishes the 1/8th.
Ill put money on that. I have 2 s2ks that will take you up on that. I also have a 1.6lt Civic that will want to play also |
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by TheGoaT
your welcome to come down and find out.
congrats on a 11 sec s2k since thats what your claiming you have Theres you 11sec S2K |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:26 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands