Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

Iam sure you will win. The Gt only has 265hp and its 500+ more lbs then a S2K. There not fast at all, teh stock Cobra is not shit

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

I agree, a car making 380 RWHP stock is pretty shitty....

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

How do they make 385rwhp when there rated @ 395-400 at the crank? I drove one. It had very good pick up at first but it didnt have shit at the top end

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

yes,they are rated at 390 crank hp...but i have been in several bone stock 03-04 cobra dyno sessions and just about every one of them dynoed 355-365 to the wheels.if you do the math that should yeild closer to 420-430 at the crank.ford and chevy have been under-rating the hp levels of their specialty cars for quite some time now.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

let's all piss on each other and call each others cars crap, or respect the car for what it is and leave it at that...?
but if shit is talked...God help us all :rolleyes:

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

I'd like to see you run faster than a 13.5 in your stock S2000. :rolleyes: By the way, Nic didn't just pull that phrase out of his ass. It's a common saying among race car drivers.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

Ford deliberatly and terribly underrated them ;)

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

I doubt it. :rolleyes:

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

Well where should I start??? First off I can prove that this guy dosen't lie about his car. BLACKTURBOS2K His s2k puts over 400 to the ground and I belive it was something like 436whp at like 16-18psi. He has a built motor using weiso piston's,eagle rods, and I forget what sleeves. I belive he is running like 660 or 720cc injectors and is tuned using a AFC. I personally have been in and raced his turbo S2K. at 12psi I beat him at 18psi he owned me. Now just another fact. Jon at Inline Pro knows BLACKTURBOS2K very very well and both have Turbo S2K'S putting over 400 to the ground. maybe you check out there website before calling some one lying. Here ill help you out. go to www.InlinePro.com and then find the link where it says turbo kit's for the s2k. The black s2k pictured is BLACKTURBOS2K "shauns car" Now he may be a cocky fucker on a net but he has EVERY right to be. He has the sickest S2K around the NoVA area possibly one of the sickest in the US. Some respect should be giving to him considering he did everything to his car except tuning on his own.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

let me guess, from a roll?? where the torque is not much of a factor as it is from a stop.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

hahaha do you not realize you can pick up a 04 cobra for about 2-3k more than you paid for your car, and for about 500 bucks it will run 11s? How much money is in your car to get an 11? hahah ya they arent shit. And they weigh like 800 pounds more.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

you dont need much on the top end when you put 6 cars on someone out of the hole. Its not a race to 200mph 2F2F.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

you seem to be missing the point, 11.9 with 436whp in a "2800" lb car is not impressive.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

that's an understatement.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

Since when is an s2k a drag car? They are quick (not fast), but take them to an autocross to see what they are truely made for. All this is pretty basic. s2k's are top end vehicles, torqueless. Mustangs are the complete opposite. But once again we are comparing apples and oranges, an N/A 4-cyl. to a V8. I love my s2k and I would take it over a Mustang or any other domestic anyday, but some people feel different. Big deal. I'm sure we can all get along.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

if a 400HP s2k is one of the "sickest" in the area or country then i feel sorry for them...i'm talking the car not you personally blaks2ktypeguyperson. Seeing srt-4's putting out those numbers right after their introduction and s2k's are fighting for them when they've been out for how long? a 400HP car is impressive but i thought the almighty s2k would be good for more, especially turboed and wrapping up to 14jillion RPM's. This message is sponsored by digger and i approve this message.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

At the track....just like you can't call every S2000 a high 14 second car...you cant call every GT a mid 13 second car. Fact is, a stock GT usually runs a low to mid 14.

And yes an S2000 running an 11 is impressive....even if it is with 400+ hp. It'slike making a lightning pull 1.0+ on the skidpad, or beat a miata through a slalom. It's not what the vehical was designed to do, to make it do it is an accomplishment. You can try to convince me that you're not hating all you want but the fact is that you are. His car is impressive, maybe not to you and id doesn't have to be. Look at what you drive, your stabdards for a vehical are on the opposite end of the spectrum from his....that doesn't make his accomplishments any lass. Give credit where credit is due.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

Sorry thats right i forget V8's are the sickest thing and anything with less displacement dosent compare. Look dick head. He has 4 less clyd then you and ALOT less weight. Get your head out of the v8 gods ass and admit your wrong. His s2k makes over 430 to the wheels that means he has a 500hp S2K flywheel. Thats like your fucking v8's making 1000 or 900whp. same concept. He is making ALOT of power for a 4 clyd enough to walk your Z06's oh wait thats prob to modern for you. Its enough power to walk your 500hp 1967-75 muscle cars. Now eat a dick and give credit where credit is due.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

:thup: :thup: :thup:

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

um once again you are too busy spouting crap to see what i posted...i didn't mention a v8 in there at all
cliff notes for the Nova (weez are the baddest str33t rAc3rs evAr)

modded SRT-4 >>>> modded s2k

if 400HP is the best that can be done I feel sorry for owners who mod em. Now they are nice cars for what they are.
On a side note:
my 440ci > your TT

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

I love how people can make general statements like modded srt-4>modded s2k... if you want a car with a cheap interior, looks like ass, fwd, get an srt-4... there's a lot more to a car than straight-line power which is about the only thing an srt-4 is good for

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

Please, oh PLEASE DO, show me ANY stock S2000 in the country that has put up better 1/4 mile numbers than my STOCK 2002 Mustang GT.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

you guys are funny...

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

I ran 12.35 with 310 hp.. and 307 lb/ft of torque :)

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

my penis is bigger than all of yours.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

I dunno, I think his car is nice and thats cool that he built it up and everything. But honestly, I really don't care much for people acting like an elitist asshole just because of what they have. I think myself and many others would have a lot more respect if he was slightly more humble instead of trying to think he's better than everyone becuase of a car. In my eyes, having a turbo S2K isn't an excuse to be a cocky fucker, sorry. But that's just me.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

:stupid:

couldnt have said it better.http://www.puertoricodragracing.com/YaBBImages/huh.gif

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

umm wrong...a 900-1000 hp v8 run's well into the 8's....that is 6-5 seconds faster than stock...a huge gain.so you tell me how a 450-500 hp s2000 only getting a gain of 2 seconds over stock is the same?how about learn something before you post.and if you wanna talk about what i drive....i have 2 stangs...one is a extremely high hp car.that's how i know your little comparison doesn't work here bud.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

And with that statement you've lost all credibility. Go drive a modded SRT4, and then drive a STOCK S2000. Drive them like real cars too. Hit the brakes, have some fun in the rain, put them through some autoX times....tell me which one is more fun and which one is a better car. I have...

If you'll read the rest of my posts you'll see where I said "just as every stock S2000 isn't a slow high 14 second car...every stock Mustang GT is NOT a mid 13 second car. I've seen plenty...in fact the vast majority of stock GTs run low 14s...even mid 14. I ran 14 flat and a best of 13.87. That will beat ALMOST every stock mustang GT I've ever seen.


Also, don't think that his S2000 is the fastest one around...there are a few in the 600hp range and I know of at least one thats in the 700 range. Will it run 6s? nope. Will it be incredibly fun to drive? Yep....what else matters? It's all about what you consider fun, S2000s are one of the funnest cars that money can buy. Thats the bottom line.

(on a side note) that guy is kind of arrogant and might have gotten a warmer welcome if he was a little more humble, I'm not saying I like the guy....just his car.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

Maybe you should learn to read the entire thread. Nic wasn't talking directly to you. He was talking about this comment.
he just used your comment about torque as well.

Not to mention a vast majority of them DO run 13's stock. Hate to break it to ya, but the average is 13.7-14.1 You will see a few mid 14's out of the autos. Then again I have also seen 14.2's in an auto as well.

As for the whole 436 whp running 11.9 w/ 2800 pounds, is really pathetic. There have been 3300 pound mustangs with less than 320 rwhp running 11.5's and Many other heavier cars running those times with less hp. He may be proud of his car and he should be. Lets not mistake this as him being God because that time,hp,weight excludes him from being anywhere close to that.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

I have never seen a stock mustang gt running 13s, in fact I have never lost to a stock or even mildly modded mustang gt with my 14.3 second civic from roll or from a stop. yeah Im sure they're out there but I have personally never seen them.

another thing, Im not defending the turbos2k guy because I think he's a fag, and has a very low self esteem and builds a hot car to make friends. but about his time, I think in this case and every case trap speed should be presented when posting 1/4 mile times, with that you can generally determine the potential of the car if it had a good launch off the line.
I have seen a car run low low 14's at X mph, and chop a complete second off with good tires at same mph trap speed.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

your credibility is gone when you say "funnest"

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

You've never seen a stock GT run into the 13s? Then you obviously havent looked.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

It helps if you go to the dragstrip. :D I have seen several stock GT's run 13's. I am on over 5 different mustang sites and see them there all the time. Just because your neck of the woods doesnt have them, doesn't mean the mainstream doesn't.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

What are you trying to say? you wanna run my TT? ::confused::

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

Now I agree... when your less cocky you do seem to get more respect and more people like you. Good point.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

you took that wrong... way wrong look at what I said.

He has a 250hp car from factory it now makes 500.

Thats like you guys who make 350hp from factory making 700

Same concept i may of over did or said it but thats what i ment.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

Yes but he runs 11.9 with 2800 pounds. He should be ALOT faster. That's why many are not impressed. You can take a LS1 and with more weight and less mods and hp still ran faster.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

Who runs 11.9?

Shaun "BLACKTURBOS2K" I dont belive has ever ran a 11.9 yet. the only person with a Turbo S2k I KNOW of that ran a 11.9 was the owner of inline pro a guy named Jon and he let off towards the end and trapped at 112 mph Shaun's black turbo s2k trapped at like 118 one time and i think 122 the next. So the speeds are more then enough to run mid to low 11's. But running on kumo ecsta tires dosent help a s2k to much and O yea the shitty axles and rear ends they run.

Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
 

Psssst....www.fordpower.net/forums

:cool: