Notices
Automotive Discussion Automotive talk that is not technical can be posted here. Posts must address the general population.

TURBO VS. SUPERCHARGER

Old Apr 7, 2004 | 08:19 PM
  #31  
DomesticRice's Avatar
Registered Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From: va beach
DomesticRice has disabled reputation
Default Re: TURBO VS. SUPERCHARGER

Originally Posted by EvaUnit01
Good point there, it's what you want to do. IMO, superchargers are great for daily drivers. But a turbo has it's plus side too.
What would you rather have on your daily driver a turbo that makes full boost by 3k rpm or a cent. supercharger(vortech) that makes full boost at redline?
Old Apr 7, 2004 | 09:03 PM
  #32  
LSPinoy's Avatar
VIP
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,033
Likes: 0
LSPinoy is infamous around these partsLSPinoy is infamous around these partsLSPinoy is infamous around these partsLSPinoy is infamous around these partsLSPinoy is infamous around these partsLSPinoy is infamous around these partsLSPinoy is infamous around these partsLSPinoy is infamous around these partsLSPinoy is infamous around these partsLSPinoy is infamous around these partsLSPinoy is infamous around these parts
Default Re: TURBO VS. SUPERCHARGER

do a supercharged turbo setup...
Old Apr 7, 2004 | 09:27 PM
  #33  
E36DJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax
E36DJ is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: TURBO VS. SUPERCHARGER

This is going to be a long thread.


Superchargers have linear power curves, simple as that - that's the difference. For a small engine the parasitic loss you will take on with a blower probably won't be worth it, this is why 99% of fast imports on the 1/4 use turbos.

It all depends on the engine, for me turbo is less reliable and more expensive. If you are running a larger high compression engine, its probably better to simply bolt on a lower boost blower.
Old Apr 8, 2004 | 05:49 AM
  #34  
Enigma's Avatar
.........
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,840
Likes: 0
Enigma Enigma Enigma Enigma Enigma Enigma Enigma Enigma Enigma Enigma Enigma
Default Re: TURBO VS. SUPERCHARGER

Originally Posted by lsvtec2go
so far im leanin towards turbo......good insight so far guys...thanx
If you go with a turbo you can manually adjust the pressure and tune it to run easier as a daily.. then hit a light at night and turn it up (safely). Also, you can choose how to drive it and keep some decent fuel mileage.
Old Apr 8, 2004 | 07:01 AM
  #35  
Possumboy's Avatar
Captain Richard Cranium
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Alas, far from Virginia.
Possumboy is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: TURBO VS. SUPERCHARGER

quick turbo spin-up depends a lot on the diameter of your downpipe and exhaust system.

Normally aspirated engines need a certain amount of back pressure to function fully. Forced induction just wants to get rid of it as soon as possible.

Lower back pressure means that the engine isn't working as hard, which gives better mileage. It also means that the turbo spins up faster, which means quicker boost. By the nature of the turbo, there is going to be *some* amount of lag, whether you measure by fractions of a second, but you can get around that by pre-revving the engine before a start if you feel that is important.

A smaller turbo will spin up quickly, giving you boost at low rpms, but will loose effectiveness at high rpms. A larger turbo will take longer to spin up, but will give you insane power once you're in the power band. Some cars use sequential turbos...a smaller one spins up at low rpm, and a larger one takes over as the engine revs higher.
Old Apr 8, 2004 | 08:11 AM
  #36  
Enigma's Avatar
.........
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,840
Likes: 0
Enigma Enigma Enigma Enigma Enigma Enigma Enigma Enigma Enigma Enigma Enigma
Default Re: TURBO VS. SUPERCHARGER

Originally Posted by Possumboy
quick turbo spin-up depends a lot on the diameter of your downpipe and exhaust system.

Normally aspirated engines need a certain amount of back pressure to function fully. Forced induction just wants to get rid of it as soon as possible.

There is *SOME* truth in what you are saying. To get a turbo to spool quicker you could clip the turbine spool, and use the correct size D.P. and exhaust to give it enough backpressure. With smaller turbos and 2 1/2" exhaust is good for about 13-15 psi and around (ballpark guess) 300-400 CFM. It is true that F.I. needs a larger exhuast, but until you get into a huge turbo then the exhuast needs to be slightly restrictive to keep power and quik spools.

BTW: I hope this helps you out on your decision.
Old Apr 9, 2004 | 11:50 PM
  #37  
calisol's Avatar
RevTek
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,583
Likes: 0
From: seven50seven
calisol calisol calisol calisol calisol calisol calisol calisol calisol calisol calisol
Default Re: TURBO VS. SUPERCHARGER

turbo!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Old Apr 12, 2004 | 04:44 AM
  #38  
EvaUnit01's Avatar
Heretic & RSX driver
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Langley AFB
EvaUnit01 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: TURBO VS. SUPERCHARGER

Depends on the type of supercharger DomesticRice. The JR superchargers for the RSX and Civic SI hatchback are very efficient. It just depends on the car and type of supercharger.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Redlsvtec4door
Engine / Exhaust / Drivetrain
2
Jan 13, 2009 08:40 PM
beem3r
Tech Talk
65
Jun 14, 2007 04:11 PM
nosman757
Automotive Discussion
2
Apr 12, 2004 03:07 PM



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:02 AM.