TURBO VS. SUPERCHARGER
Turbo is going to be a bigger headache.. but it will produce more hp than a SC. There is much more to be done with a turbo, cost is dependant on doing it yourself (cheaper) or getting a kit (over-rated). You have turbo lag to deal with (it CAN be a bitch unless you know how to correct it), or SC and it's always there. SC might creat more torwue than your Honda will be able to keep down on the front tires.. turbo will come out laater and get you moving hard in that light Honda. All depends on what you need, I'd go turbo.. no sense in getting all this torque you can't use.
Originally Posted by SBMotors
Both have one VERY good thing in common... BOOST, BUT turbos make alot of heat and heat can kill and superchargers are parasitic. I love 'em both.
Originally Posted by Black&Blown01GT
a turbo will give him more torque than a blower would...and it will make power sooner because its driven by load (exhaust) than rpm (crank speed)
Originally Posted by Murphyd311
It basically boils down to: what car/engine; what your goals are; how reliable you want it to be; and how much do you want to spend. With some cars, you can just slap a supercharger right on, but a turbo would need ECU and fuel upgrades. Sometimes the power of a turbo just outweighs a supercharger.







