lets see those dyno #'s from the J&J car show
DAAAANG & OHDAANG
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,441
Likes: 0
From: va beach, va
look at your damn sig dude, it says 14.3 quarter mile time. who gives a shit if thats stock or not its in ur fucking sig with the words NSX killer underneath. go run ur fucking car agian then change your quarter mile time. it just looks RETARDED to see ur 14.3 time and claiming to be an nsx killer. if ur faster then that now GREAT! it just looked alittle bit like you have NO idea what your talking about in ur sig right now
Banned
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,538
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Honda-S2000
hows my sig look... thats when i was stock though, so im gonna put it in my sig anyway cause now i crush cobras. those times were when i was STOCK!!
-look alittle retarded in my sig?-
hows my sig look... thats when i was stock though, so im gonna put it in my sig anyway cause now i crush cobras. those times were when i was STOCK!!
-look alittle retarded in my sig?-
whos s2k only got 160 whp at this car show?
his car is will beat nsx period.... His car ran STOCK @ 14.3 (roughly about 170whp)
hes not stock by any means now
Go fuck yourself
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,403
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Boosted2003
your making your self look liek a retard man...
whos s2k only got 160 whp at this car show?
his car is will beat nsx period.... His car ran STOCK @ 14.3 (roughly about 170whp)
hes not stock by any means now
your making your self look liek a retard man...
whos s2k only got 160 whp at this car show?
his car is will beat nsx period.... His car ran STOCK @ 14.3 (roughly about 170whp)
hes not stock by any means now
Banned
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,538
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 2slow2race
I think every time you post it makes you look even more like a tard. MR2 2NER you have 70 roughley more that stock and now you think you can kill a nsx. I'll give you that win only if the nsx was bone stock and my grandma was driving.
I think every time you post it makes you look even more like a tard. MR2 2NER you have 70 roughley more that stock and now you think you can kill a nsx. I'll give you that win only if the nsx was bone stock and my grandma was driving.
MR2 = roughly 325whp on dynojet (374 BHP)
NSX = 280 BHP (that means crank)
MR2 = 2750 pounds no driver
NSX = 3050 pounds no driver
MR2 = 7.4 pounds per hp
NSX = 10.9 pounds per hp
so from these figures the mr2 would lose to nsx with good driver?
your the turd now bitch
Last edited by Boosted2003; Nov 23, 2003 at 02:25 PM.
Go fuck yourself
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,403
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Boosted2003
MR2 = roughly 285whp on dynojet (327 BHP)
NSX = 280 BHP (that means crank)
MR2 = 2750 pounds no driver
NSX = 3050 pounds no driver
MR2 = 8.4 pounds per hp
NSX = 10.9 pounds per hp
so from these figures the mr2 would lose to nsx with good driver?
your the turd now bitch
MR2 = roughly 285whp on dynojet (327 BHP)
NSX = 280 BHP (that means crank)
MR2 = 2750 pounds no driver
NSX = 3050 pounds no driver
MR2 = 8.4 pounds per hp
NSX = 10.9 pounds per hp
so from these figures the mr2 would lose to nsx with good driver?
your the turd now bitch
Thread Starter
Not Yet
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Honda-S2000
hows my sig look... thats when i was stock though, so im gonna put it in my sig anyway cause now i crush cobras. those times were when i was STOCK!!
-look alittle retarded in my sig?-
hows my sig look... thats when i was stock though, so im gonna put it in my sig anyway cause now i crush cobras. those times were when i was STOCK!!
-look alittle retarded in my sig?-
and if you do i really dont care. Just because i have two things in my profile doesnt mean they are directly related. And i really dont care what you think. It seems that general concensus it that you are retarded. Now go have a nice day.
Originally posted by 2slow2race
I think every time you post it makes you look even more like a tard. MR2 2NER you have 70 roughley more that stock and now you think you can kill a nsx. I'll give you that win only if the nsx was bone stock and my grandma was driving.
I think every time you post it makes you look even more like a tard. MR2 2NER you have 70 roughley more that stock and now you think you can kill a nsx. I'll give you that win only if the nsx was bone stock and my grandma was driving.
Banned
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,538
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 2slow2race
when was the last time your boy (MR2 2NER) ran a nsx and beat it??? thats what i thought cock munch STFU...back on topic what did everyone else put down???
when was the last time your boy (MR2 2NER) ran a nsx and beat it??? thats what i thought cock munch STFU...back on topic what did everyone else put down???
Thread Starter
Not Yet
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 2slow2race
when was the last time your boy (MR2 2NER) ran a nsx and beat it??? thats what i thought cock munch STFU...back on topic what did everyone else put down???
when was the last time your boy (MR2 2NER) ran a nsx and beat it??? thats what i thought cock munch STFU...back on topic what did everyone else put down???
I actually have 325 on dynojet as James has corrected it.
Go fuck yourself
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,403
Likes: 0
Originally posted by MR2 2NER
70 hp more??? I think you need to check your math. 325-170=70???? right.
70 hp more??? I think you need to check your math. 325-170=70???? right.
Originally posted by MR2 2NER
lets see them from the mustang dyno
i got 249 at 15psi and 280 at 17psi
cant wait to see it on the dynojet where it would be 288 at 15psi and 325 at 17psi
lets see them from the mustang dyno
i got 249 at 15psi and 280 at 17psi
cant wait to see it on the dynojet where it would be 288 at 15psi and 325 at 17psi
