lets see those dyno #'s from the J&J car show
Thread Starter
Not Yet
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 0
Originally posted by VTECnology
Well this thread just went completely to shit....
Look, let's just say 300whp ok....nice numbers
Also, I drive an S2000 and am a long time Honda fan. Fact is a 14.3 will beat most S2000s at the track and even a few NSXs. An MR2 with 300whp is gonna run in the low 12s I would think which will hand ANY S2000 I've ever seen it's ass at the track and unless it's a pretty damn tight NSX it'll beat almost an NSX I've ever seen too. Those are great numbers and I give you mad respect for your Mister. Sometimes I think some Honda boys need to swallow their pride a little and admit when someone has a nice car.....even if it doesn't have the little "H" on the valve cover.
Well this thread just went completely to shit....
Look, let's just say 300whp ok....nice numbers
Also, I drive an S2000 and am a long time Honda fan. Fact is a 14.3 will beat most S2000s at the track and even a few NSXs. An MR2 with 300whp is gonna run in the low 12s I would think which will hand ANY S2000 I've ever seen it's ass at the track and unless it's a pretty damn tight NSX it'll beat almost an NSX I've ever seen too. Those are great numbers and I give you mad respect for your Mister. Sometimes I think some Honda boys need to swallow their pride a little and admit when someone has a nice car.....even if it doesn't have the little "H" on the valve cover.
i probably hate you
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 0
From: Denzel, WA
Originally posted by VTECnology
Well this thread just went completely to shit....
Look, let's just say 300whp ok....nice numbers
Also, I drive an S2000 and am a long time Honda fan. Fact is a 14.3 will beat most S2000s at the track and even a few NSXs. An MR2 with 300whp is gonna run in the low 12s I would think which will hand ANY S2000 I've ever seen it's ass at the track and unless it's a pretty damn tight NSX it'll beat almost an NSX I've ever seen too. Those are great numbers and I give you mad respect for your Mister. Sometimes I think some Honda boys need to swallow their pride a little and admit when someone has a nice car.....even if it doesn't have the little "H" on the valve cover.
Well this thread just went completely to shit....
Look, let's just say 300whp ok....nice numbers
Also, I drive an S2000 and am a long time Honda fan. Fact is a 14.3 will beat most S2000s at the track and even a few NSXs. An MR2 with 300whp is gonna run in the low 12s I would think which will hand ANY S2000 I've ever seen it's ass at the track and unless it's a pretty damn tight NSX it'll beat almost an NSX I've ever seen too. Those are great numbers and I give you mad respect for your Mister. Sometimes I think some Honda boys need to swallow their pride a little and admit when someone has a nice car.....even if it doesn't have the little "H" on the valve cover.
on the subject of the dyno numbers. theres no point in arguing over that. a 16% correction factor has been found. however, even if we show 100 examples of it there will still be naysayers. mr2 2ner just needs to eventually get it on a dynojet to get everyone to agree. esentally; its just a car, theyre just hp figures, theres no point in getting heated over it.
~
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
From: FL / VA
bahahahahahahahahahaha
sweet. well VMP hooks a little better than richmond, id say on average about .2 better, so next time i run a 13.5 at richmond, i'll say i ran a 13.3
see how dumb you look? good numbers, but you sound like a true moron posting up something that hasnt happened yet. i think we all know dynojets dyno a little higher than mustangs. whether or not it is for the right reasons in irrelevant, but dont post up numbers you did on a calculator. thats just retarded
like i said, good numbers
sweet. well VMP hooks a little better than richmond, id say on average about .2 better, so next time i run a 13.5 at richmond, i'll say i ran a 13.3
see how dumb you look? good numbers, but you sound like a true moron posting up something that hasnt happened yet. i think we all know dynojets dyno a little higher than mustangs. whether or not it is for the right reasons in irrelevant, but dont post up numbers you did on a calculator. thats just retarded
like i said, good numbers
Thread Starter
Not Yet
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 0
Originally posted by reuter
bahahahahahahahahahaha
sweet. well VMP hooks a little better than richmond, id say on average about .2 better, so next time i run a 13.5 at richmond, i'll say i ran a 13.3
see how dumb you look? good numbers, but you sound like a true moron posting up something that hasnt happened yet. i think we all know dynojets dyno a little higher than mustangs. whether or not it is for the right reasons in irrelevant, but dont post up numbers you did on a calculator. thats just retarded
like i said, good numbers
bahahahahahahahahahaha
sweet. well VMP hooks a little better than richmond, id say on average about .2 better, so next time i run a 13.5 at richmond, i'll say i ran a 13.3
see how dumb you look? good numbers, but you sound like a true moron posting up something that hasnt happened yet. i think we all know dynojets dyno a little higher than mustangs. whether or not it is for the right reasons in irrelevant, but dont post up numbers you did on a calculator. thats just retarded
like i said, good numbers
Go fuck yourself
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,403
Likes: 0
Originally posted by MR2 2NER
you know what you can think that, and i am not going to get all heated up saying your wrong cause i could careless about your shit, and you might be right about richmond. I dont think there is anything wrong with giving calculations. And next time you go to the track let me know, it would be interesting to finally meet you. Just would love to meet such an ass.
you know what you can think that, and i am not going to get all heated up saying your wrong cause i could careless about your shit, and you might be right about richmond. I dont think there is anything wrong with giving calculations. And next time you go to the track let me know, it would be interesting to finally meet you. Just would love to meet such an ass.
. O BTW I drive a jeep and I know I can hand some honda's there ass so should I say I'm a honda killer???
Banned
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,538
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 2slow2race
someones got there panties in a bunch.. I'll say this those a decent number yes but like reuter said don't claim somthing you haven't done. Thats all, and about being a nsx killer im sure you could beat a nsx but you said you've beat one .....so now your a nsx killer . O BTW I drive a jeep and I know I can hand some honda's there ass so should I say I'm a honda killer???
someones got there panties in a bunch.. I'll say this those a decent number yes but like reuter said don't claim somthing you haven't done. Thats all, and about being a nsx killer im sure you could beat a nsx but you said you've beat one .....so now your a nsx killer
. O BTW I drive a jeep and I know I can hand some honda's there ass so should I say I'm a honda killer???
wow good one for u.... ive killed hondas too lol...
~
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
From: FL / VA
this is from an article that the mustang dyno company published on there website...
The Dynojet measured 5.1 percent higher horsepower in Fourth gear, 7 percent higher horsepower in Third gear, and 8.2 percent higher horsepower in Second gear.
but what do they know, they only invented it.
http://www.mustangdyne.com/Articles/...article-03.htm
The Dynojet measured 5.1 percent higher horsepower in Fourth gear, 7 percent higher horsepower in Third gear, and 8.2 percent higher horsepower in Second gear.
but what do they know, they only invented it.
http://www.mustangdyne.com/Articles/...article-03.htm