Interesting Read: Virginian Pilot-Reviews 2006 Eclipse
Originally Posted by GR1FFON
Momentum refers to a rate of speed, or better rate of acceleration correct? So, the car has a rate of acceleration from the line to the finish,
..............
Mid-late 15's make a lot more sense.
..............
Mid-late 15's make a lot more sense.
I dont think you are getting it.
(1) 1/4 mile pass is going to be substantially faster than (1) 1/8 mile pass when multiplied times 2, since you no long have the 00-??MPH that you have to overcome.
Originally Posted by GR1FFON
SO, the variable in the equation is distance which is halved, everything being relative, doubling the 1/8 mi time with a margin of error can be used to project, NOT ACCURATELY MEASURE a 1/4 time.
That being said, I made that post to try and find out where that guy was getting his math. He said it does 8.3 in 1/8mi and the proceeded to say the car would do mid-late 14's.
Mid-late 15's make a lot more sense.
at the start of a standing 1/8th mile, your velocity is 0. you accelerate from the beginning to the end of 1/8th mile, where your velocity is whatever after a certain period of time.
if you imagine the 1/4 mile as two 1/8ths, at the end of the first 1/8th you would STILL be traveling at whatever mph AND accelerating, obviously completing the same distance as the first 1/8th in a much shorter time.
Last edited by J. O. BUDS; Aug 15, 2005 at 11:07 AM.
Originally Posted by Rally Red 98
it can be used to inaccurately project 1/4 mile times.
at the start of a standing 1/8th mile, your velocity is 0. you accelerate from the beginning to the end of 1/8th mile, where your velocity is whatever after a certain period of time.
if you imagine the 1/4 mile as two 1/8ths, at the end of the first 1/8th you would STILL be traveling at whatever mph AND accelerating, obviously completing the same distance as the first 1/8th in a much shorter time.
at the start of a standing 1/8th mile, your velocity is 0. you accelerate from the beginning to the end of 1/8th mile, where your velocity is whatever after a certain period of time.
if you imagine the 1/4 mile as two 1/8ths, at the end of the first 1/8th you would STILL be traveling at whatever mph AND accelerating, obviously completing the same distance as the first 1/8th in a much shorter time.
The math may not be perfect, and I didn't say it was totally accurate. I still say stock, this new eclipse should run 15's
probably a typo and should read 18.3 1/4 mile, up there with just about every other non-turbo eclipse out there..
(yes, i'm being a jackass. no. i'm not entirely serious, only stands for the n/a 4 cylinder which is probably about the slowest thing i've ever driven)
(yes, i'm being a jackass. no. i'm not entirely serious, only stands for the n/a 4 cylinder which is probably about the slowest thing i've ever driven)
i've run 8.90 in the 1/8th and 14.1 in the quarter, and my car is not known for top end. that's a difference of 4 seconds. a turbo car (especially FWD) would probably do much better in the 1/8th and a back-halfed car might do worse... but i don't doubt that the new eclipse could go mid-low 14s depending on options.
not trying to argue, just trying to show that we aren't making this up.
not trying to argue, just trying to show that we aren't making this up.
Last edited by J. O. BUDS; Aug 15, 2005 at 12:30 PM.
Originally Posted by DeadEvoVIII
(yes, i'm being a jackass. no. i'm not entirely serious, only stands for the n/a 4 cylinder which is probably about the slowest thing i've ever driven)
Originally Posted by GR1FFON
there aren't many cars that carry the same exact design from concept to production...Changes are made between to tailor the vehicle to the target market...
Only real changes were engine related. And minor body modifications (like a spoiler, adding an extra small triangular window behind the side windows, eliminating the holes in the fenders, and making the lower air dam grills larger). If you covered over that rear window, swap your wheels with larger ones, lower it a little, and put spacers on, it'll look almost exactly like the concept.
Last edited by Greyhaven7; Aug 15, 2005 at 01:11 PM.
Originally Posted by Rally Red 98
i've run 8.90 in the 1/8th and 14.1 in the quarter, and my car is not known for top end. that's a difference of 4 seconds. a turbo car (especially FWD) would probably do much better in the 1/8th and a back-halfed car might do worse... but i don't doubt that the new eclipse could go mid-low 14s depending on options.
not trying to argue, just trying to show that we aren't making this up.
not trying to argue, just trying to show that we aren't making this up.

Originally Posted by Greyhaven7
The TT did.
Only real changes were engine related. And minor body modifications (like a spoiler, adding an extra small triangular window behind the side windows, eliminating the holes in the fenders, and making the lower air dam grills larger). If you covered over that rear window, swap your wheels with larger ones, lower it a little, and put spacers on, it'll look almost exactly like the concept.
Only real changes were engine related. And minor body modifications (like a spoiler, adding an extra small triangular window behind the side windows, eliminating the holes in the fenders, and making the lower air dam grills larger). If you covered over that rear window, swap your wheels with larger ones, lower it a little, and put spacers on, it'll look almost exactly like the concept.
Originally Posted by GR1FFON
That's true, but then again, Europeans are way more open to design experimentation than Americans, and the Eclipse (as I last checked) exclusively American.





