Originally Posted by sung

The point is that we shouldn't have to add those types of variations to the censor. Follow the rules or face the consequences. I was talking about a very specific technique that is sometimes used.

Originally Posted by dave22

I was WAY undershooting with that fifteen estimate. There are entirely too many combinations to go in and correct. Here's an example for a five letter word. Let's say every letter in brackets has been moodified to work. I got thirty combinations only modifying up to three of the five letters and I got sick of it before I could even get them all down:

[n]igga
n[i]gga
ni[g]ga
nig[g]a
nigg[a]
[ni]gga
n[ig]ga
ni[gg]a
nig[ga]
[n][i]gga
[n]i[g]ga
[n]ig[g]a
[n]igg[a]
n[i][g]ga
n[i]g[g]a
n[i]gg[a]
ni[g][g]a
ni[g]g[a]
nig[g][a]
[nig]ga
n[igg]a
ni[gga]
[n][i][g]ga
n[i][g][g]a
ni[g][g][a]
[n]i[g]g[a]
[n]ig[g][a]
[n]i[gg]a
[n][i][g]ga
[ni]g[g]a

There are probably close to a hundred combinations you can use just for this five-letter word. The combination possibilities will increase dramatically with every new letter added.


So it would take a little more than two minutes.

Originally Posted by SignfcntOthr

Starting now.

Originally Posted by The_rabbit1

/close now??

Originally Posted by s.morgan

I'm on the same page as Sung, in which case it would only take 2 minutes.