New Mitsu Ralliart-baby evo X
Thread Starter
Registered Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: the beach
Re: New Mitsu Ralliart-baby evo X
From what I can read on evom... the only difference is interior and exterior stuff... BBS wheels, navigation..etc...etc..
Last edited by GrenadeCRX; Jun 27, 2008 at 05:35 AM.
Your Local DSM Tech
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,711
Likes: 0
From: Newport News
Registered member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
From: Aylett
Re: New Mitsu Ralliart-baby evo X
From what I've read the Evo X has been dumbed down for the general public. I mean yes, it's pretty much as fast, and has some cool electronic stuff to make it easier to drive fast, but it's not as much of a drivers car. From the tests i've read, the Evo X was easier to drive around the track fast, but a good driver is able to get more out of an Evo IX. I'm also a fan of the 4G63, it's a classic engine. In my opinion, it deserves to be right up there in history with the old big block V8s and stuff from the 60s. I also prefer the looks of the older Evos to the new one. I mean, the new one looks pretty good, but I like the older one's better. If I were to get one it would be a second car, a toy car to play around with, and I'd rather have the "classic" Evo. Besides, people will be wanting to upgrade to the Evo X, so the older ones will be cheaper to buy.
Thread Starter
Registered Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: the beach
Re: New Mitsu Ralliart-baby evo X
Don't worry about it, you have every right to ask
From what I've read the Evo X has been dumbed down for the general public. I mean yes, it's pretty much as fast, and has some cool electronic stuff to make it easier to drive fast, but it's not as much of a drivers car. From the tests i've read, the Evo X was easier to drive around the track fast, but a good driver is able to get more out of an Evo IX. I'm also a fan of the 4G63, it's a classic engine. In my opinion, it deserves to be right up there in history with the old big block V8s and stuff from the 60s. I also prefer the looks of the older Evos to the new one. I mean, the new one looks pretty good, but I like the older one's better. If I were to get one it would be a second car, a toy car to play around with, and I'd rather have the "classic" Evo. Besides, people will be wanting to upgrade to the Evo X, so the older ones will be cheaper to buy.
From what I've read the Evo X has been dumbed down for the general public. I mean yes, it's pretty much as fast, and has some cool electronic stuff to make it easier to drive fast, but it's not as much of a drivers car. From the tests i've read, the Evo X was easier to drive around the track fast, but a good driver is able to get more out of an Evo IX. I'm also a fan of the 4G63, it's a classic engine. In my opinion, it deserves to be right up there in history with the old big block V8s and stuff from the 60s. I also prefer the looks of the older Evos to the new one. I mean, the new one looks pretty good, but I like the older one's better. If I were to get one it would be a second car, a toy car to play around with, and I'd rather have the "classic" Evo. Besides, people will be wanting to upgrade to the Evo X, so the older ones will be cheaper to buy.
Keeping It Real !!
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,760
Likes: 0
Re: New Mitsu Ralliart-baby evo X
A loaded Lancer GTS tops out around $22K, and the cheapest Evolution X GSR starts north of $33K. This leaves a big opening for the 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart.
From Edmunds
From Edmunds
UNCE UNCE UNCE UNCE
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,811
Likes: 0
From: J'Ville FL.
Re: New Mitsu Ralliart-baby evo X
It\'d be curious as to see what can swap over to what DSM to Evo X/Ralliart. Obviously once they come out with a T4 manifold I could put the 35R on it, Tial stuff etc. But I am wondering about the injectors. I can\'t forsee Mitsu changing the impedence, that\'d be weird.
Thread Starter
Registered Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: the beach
