View Poll Results: 2008 AWD BATTLE
EVO X MR



66
41.25%
WRX STI



52
32.50%
VW R32



14
8.75%
These three cars ar slow/ ugly



28
17.50%
Voters: 160. You may not vote on this poll
2008 AWD Battle
Every MK4 R32 iv ever ran into was slower than my car. Now, im sure driving had something to do with it but then again it wasnt even close.
They werent stock either, all three having turbo backs and they were chipped (accourding to the drivers).
But that beside the point....given the competition, its an underpowered pig. Its competition is more like the WRX not the STI or EVO X.
They werent stock either, all three having turbo backs and they were chipped (accourding to the drivers).
But that beside the point....given the competition, its an underpowered pig. Its competition is more like the WRX not the STI or EVO X.
Last edited by Muncher; Dec 1, 2007 at 09:35 PM.
Every MK4 R32 iv ever ran into was slower than my car. Now, im sure driving had something to do with it but then again it wasnt even close.
They werent stock either, all three having turbo backs and they were chipped (accourding to the drivers).
But that beside the point....given the competition, its an underpowered pig. Its competition is more like the WRX not the STI or EVO X.
They werent stock either, all three having turbo backs and they were chipped (accourding to the drivers).
But that beside the point....given the competition, its an underpowered pig. Its competition is more like the WRX not the STI or EVO X.
They werent stock either, all three having turbo backs and they were chipped (accourding to the drivers).
But that beside the point....given the competition, its an underpowered pig. Its competition is more like the WRX not the STI or EVO X.




