Richmond sat. nite
speed racer
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
From: Glen allen va
Re: Richmond sat. nite
Originally Posted by The Wok
No mazda? lol.
he was saying no mazda when u compare engine size for the power they make per cubic inch, its not even a piston engine so it dont have to big to make power
Registered member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,447
Likes: 0
Re: Richmond sat. nite
Originally Posted by The Wok
I understand that. But ruling them out kind of ruins the entire hp/liter supremacy argument, don't you think?
speed racer
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
From: Glen allen va
Re: Richmond sat. nite
Originally Posted by The Wok
I understand that. But ruling them out kind of ruins the entire hp/liter supremacy argument, don't you think?
Registered member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,447
Likes: 0
Re: Richmond sat. nite
Originally Posted by The Wok
So winning a "competition" by excluding those you know will "beat" you is cool?
DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,634
Likes: 0
From: Midlothian
Re: Richmond sat. nite
Ok so we should be fair and start an argument that we know Mustangs will win.
And exclude any non-mustangs or hondas that might topple the mustangs. Am I getting this right? Im new at it.
And exclude any non-mustangs or hondas that might topple the mustangs. Am I getting this right? Im new at it.
DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,634
Likes: 0
From: Midlothian
Re: Richmond sat. nite
I know it's a double post, but I also find it mildly hilarious that all 3 arguing parties have a terrible grasp on the english language.
We should get some translation at the end, from idiot to english.
We should get some translation at the end, from idiot to english.
speed racer
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
From: Glen allen va
Re: Richmond sat. nite
Originally Posted by wheelman
I too here am going to have to politely disagree. There are literally millions of n/a 5.0's on the road in cars, trucks. Even my own coupe has over 120K on the stock short block and makes a very reliable 300 rwhp and has done so for years. I can't see where you could say that about a 302. Now if you were referring to a 96-98 2V 4.6 then possibly I could agree with you. I think the young stangmanGT804 is caught up possibly in pride of his own vehicle. Pride in of itself is fine, but too much pride in this situation is ill placed, espeically when dealing with built cars of the magnitude in this thread. I am equally as impressed by a well done Honda as I am any mustang, but make no mistake, there as many import shit talkers as there mustang ones. Trust me, I think I spoke to half of them over the past year
and my stang wont stock it had a chip full ex with H pipes and cam with a intake manifold
but you making 300whp with the old body 5.0 with a stock short block allmotor is very respectable and should be a low 13 to high 12sec car right?
DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,634
Likes: 0
From: Midlothian
Re: Richmond sat. nite
Originally Posted by DLB1994
nothing against you but i have owned a 95 5.0 gt and it was slow as balls fun car to drive since they make crazy lowend tq and it makes the car really feels so much faster then is it when you get in high rpms the just falls off fast my 1st time in a dohc vtec honda i was sold for one reason i never felt a engine they revs like a bike and makes power in to the revlimter stock
and my stang wont stock it had a chip full ex with H pipes and cam with a intake manifold
but you making 300whp with the old body 5.0 with a stock short block allmotor is very respectable and should be a low 13 to high 12sec car right?
and my stang wont stock it had a chip full ex with H pipes and cam with a intake manifold
but you making 300whp with the old body 5.0 with a stock short block allmotor is very respectable and should be a low 13 to high 12sec car right?