LMAO..bangs hand on table and wipes the tears..... that was the magazine time for the camaro that was in comparison you IDIOT Looks like you missed something you horses ass.

Even more insult to your so called" the fastest Mach 1 there is is a 13.3" claim. here is one from MM.
Astute readers of MM&FF will note that we've tested both the '03 and the '04 Mach 1 in past issues where we recorded quarter-mile elapsed times of 13.13 and 13.15, respectively, both at 105 mph. In fact, we have hours of seat time in these cars and most of you know the story behind them.
Here is the link as well so you can "believe" what I write.
http://musclemustangfastfords.com/features/0407mm_mach/

Another good interesting lesson( I shyould charge your dumbass for these). From the North Amercias fastest production cars...

The following is a list we've compiled of the fastest accelerating production cars (F.A.P.C.) and trucks built by any major manufacturer for the North American market. Although the list includes a lot of newer prestige vehicles that cannot be defined as 'classic' or 'muscle' cars, they are definitely collectors and destined to be classics. The data was compiled from the results of independent tests conducted by several major publications in the U.S. and Canada.* We've simply taken the quickest quarter mile elapsed times and listed them in order from quickest to slowest. We didn't bother including any vehicles with a quarter mile time of more than 14 seconds. Trivial? Yes, but still intriguing. Why? We did it simply to satisfy your curiosity. Accurate? Not necessarily.* That largely depends on possibly hundreds of factors that need to be taken into account during testing, including weather, altitude, drivers, traction, etc. Hmmm looks like thats a disclaimer regarding ET's that can be expected from a vehicle.
http://www.autofacts.ca/classics/fast.htm

Since you like magazines and articles and stuff

 

i'm in fredericksburg, taking a year off from school


the whole arguement over the last few pages is stupid.. as woodrow has pointed out many times, it's all in the driver. some people are better than others. my car has gone .4 faster in the 1/4 with a better driver than me (though i don't claim that time, since it wasn't me driving), and i know many people who are worse than me.. dirver can make all the difference, as nic has shown us with his GT that destroys the mag times.

muscle car mags aside, car magazines are nothing but a big load of stupid. if the magazines were right, i could go put a grounding kit on my car and gain like 40 to the wheels

as far as idle sounds.. here's my submission:
http://www.vadsm.com/uploads/talon.wma

 

man i was there and i beat al those mother fuckers

 

and if you had tried to sneak around me when we was bouts to to race man, ida opened my door on your ass.

i hate bitches like you

 

weird, i must have missed you, and i passed by the race while i was jogging

 

i was probably pullin back by then

 

why? so your door could be ripped off??

 

and his ass would pay for it. he was passing on the shoulder. i could say i was stopped for any reason. it would be my word against his and they always take my word for it.

besides, doors are easy to replace. i dont have any power components in it because im pretty hardcore.

 

OWNED http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ggt/index.html
"Yet, 0-60 mph in 5.4 seconds and a 14.0-second/100.2-mph quarter-mile run is as good or better than any stock Mustang we've ever tested, Cobra or not."

 

Doing sexual favors for cops doesn't count.