hehe, steve would stomp me. same hp/torque (almost identical performing engines) and he's like 400 pounds lighter.

 

It is still pysically imposible for the car to make that much tq and not have a huge amount of HP. He only made 160ish hp. Crate can you post that dyno sheet I would love to see it.

 

crate didnt you do that at the TTE event when the dyno was showing insane torque numbers?

 

On a mustang dyno, it multiplies the torgue by which gear u are in. For example, i have 333.3 ft/ lbs torque. Take that and divide it by which gear you are in, which i am in third gear. Therefore leaving be with a whopping 111.1 ft/lbs torque. Man that is whack yooooooooooooooo! lol My torque is like whoaaaaaaaaaaa

 

its not that easy. and steve, I can't find the information or i'd post it. When i get it i will post it. It makes sense when somebody explains it.

 

ya... doing that i only had 129lbs/ft torque.

 

Dear Pimpin'
I garontee you that pimpin' is easier than learing the fundimentals of the mathmatical computations that Mustang uses to measure torque/HP on their eddy-current dyno. 1- unless an RPM sensor is attached to your engine, it cannot measure torque, with the eddy-current-based operation. 2-They have NO way of knowing what gear ratio you have in your car. 3- They measure input and output shaft speed and input and output torque. In order to find the value of any of these (such as output torque), you only need three of them. Engine torque is determined by a mathmatical relationship between engine RPM and roller RPM then apply a converse relationship to the output torque. Got it?
BR
Michael
motomktg@cox.net

 

Same thing as what Kilgore said but in much more detailed terms.

 

Thanks Rico and Michael. not sure that will suffice for some of those guys though.

 

No prob! I think I confused myself more though with the link I posted