jdm99ek

Im ordering new wheels and tires for my civic, and i was wondering if anyone had any experience with either of these tires? if you know anything helpful about either of them it would be greatly appreciated. or if there is another tires in the same price range, im open to suggestions.

Falken ZE912- V rated, 87 load, 40K mile warranty, treadwear 360
Hankook H405- H rated, 88 load, tread wear 340

ill be orderin 205/45/16

jdm99ek

Also lookin at Yokohama H4S-60k mile warranty, treadwear 500, h rated, 87 load

RandomTask

What do you plan on doing with your car? Auto-X? Getting Groceries?

jdm99ek

CROCERIES! woot!, but seriously its a DD. i just want a tire that will last a decent amount of time and will give a good ride and handling

drunkard

which is cheaper?

jdm99ek

the yokahamas are 82, the hankook are 77, and the falkens are 79

drunkard

go with the yoks $3 more and they will last longer since this is your dd. Make sure you pick the one with a better wet traction rating.

jdm99ek

thats what im thinkin, its just astounds me how people can be so ignorant about stuff like this

ive been reading reviews and people are talking about how they replaced there old tires with the yoks and and have hated them, then others have absolutely loved them. then i read on, and the people who hated them pretty much expect them to be the best tires ever, for under 100 a piece.
i dont think they will be too bad. the two replacement toyos i have for th whats onthe car now, cost 167 each, and i had to buy two.

drunkard

my brother bought the Nitto Neogen. The handling/traction was actually pretty decent. Held very nicely around sweeping, and some sharp, turns.

jdm99ek

i looked at the neogens, and i like em, but the treadwear rating isnt exactly great, so i think imma get the yokos