Air to water, or Air to Air?
#1
Team Rad Racing
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: HELLTRACK
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Air to water, or Air to Air?
Im changing my motor setup and I am in the air as to whether go with an air to water intercooler setup, or go with a bigger air to air setup. Opinions are welcome with some sort of reason as to why you think I should go one way or the other. Thank you ahead of time.
#3
Racetracks
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: How long is a piece of string?
Posts: 15,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Air to water, or Air to Air?
Air to air is easier to make efficient and usually way cheaper. You can get a lot of bang for your buck with a front mount air/air setup and there's no maintanance and nothing to fail really. You add more weight, complexity, and cost with an air/water setup, and there are more things to fail. That's not to say there aren't some good reasons to have an air/water setup, but for street cars it's a hard thing to justify. You have to have a radiator, charge cooler, header tank, pump, coolant lines, charge tubing, etc. instead of just the intercooler and charge piping for something like a front mount air/air.
It really depends on the setup and the car, but I'd find it hard to lean on the side of the air/water for most situations. It's just really hard to beat an air/air for efficiency most of the time..
That being said, I'm going to replace my top mount WRX intercooler with a air/water unit this summer if I can scrape the money together. Why? I like to fabricate stuff.. If I were sane I'd just buy a bigger top mount or front mount like the rest of the world.
So to answer your question, my opinion would be a bigger air to air setup..
It really depends on the setup and the car, but I'd find it hard to lean on the side of the air/water for most situations. It's just really hard to beat an air/air for efficiency most of the time..
That being said, I'm going to replace my top mount WRX intercooler with a air/water unit this summer if I can scrape the money together. Why? I like to fabricate stuff.. If I were sane I'd just buy a bigger top mount or front mount like the rest of the world.
So to answer your question, my opinion would be a bigger air to air setup..
#4
Drink Up, Chumps
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Palm Beach Gardens
Posts: 20,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Air to water, or Air to Air?
Is it for your hatch? And do you even drive it on the street anymore or is it just a drag car?
Wanna fab me up a c/f roof?
Dead serious.
Originally Posted by Fabrik8
I like to fabricate stuff..
Dead serious.
#5
Team Rad Racing
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: HELLTRACK
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Air to water, or Air to Air?
Originally Posted by Fabrik8
Air to air is easier to make efficient and usually way cheaper. You can get a lot of bang for your buck with a front mount air/air setup and there's no maintanance and nothing to fail really. You add more weight, complexity, and cost with an air/water setup, and there are more things to fail. That's not to say there aren't some good reasons to have an air/water setup, but for street cars it's a hard thing to justify. You have to have a radiator, charge cooler, header tank, pump, coolant lines, charge tubing, etc. instead of just the intercooler and charge piping for something like a front mount air/air.
It really depends on the setup and the car, but I'd find it hard to lean on the side of the air/water for most situations. It's just really hard to beat an air/air for efficiency most of the time..
That being said, I'm going to replace my top mount WRX intercooler with a air/water unit this summer if I can scrape the money together. Why? I like to fabricate stuff.. If I were sane I'd just buy a bigger top mount or front mount like the rest of the world.
So to answer your question, my opinion would be a bigger air to air setup..
It really depends on the setup and the car, but I'd find it hard to lean on the side of the air/water for most situations. It's just really hard to beat an air/air for efficiency most of the time..
That being said, I'm going to replace my top mount WRX intercooler with a air/water unit this summer if I can scrape the money together. Why? I like to fabricate stuff.. If I were sane I'd just buy a bigger top mount or front mount like the rest of the world.
So to answer your question, my opinion would be a bigger air to air setup..
Originally Posted by blah
Is it for your hatch? And do you even drive it on the street anymore or is it just a drag car?
I also know that air to water is not really good for driving on the street because the water heats up. I figured if i had a decent heat exchanger and a nice size resevoir to hold more water that i wouldnt have that problem. I mean Josh MR2 2NR didnt have a problem and the superchargers for s2ks have air to water intercooler setups. The only downside im seeing is having a water tank somewhere. But thats also why i made this thread to see if there is more to it that i do not know about.
Last edited by MP5; 02-06-2006 at 09:28 PM.
#6
Racetracks
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: How long is a piece of string?
Posts: 15,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Air to water, or Air to Air?
You'll need more than an oil cooler, a small radiator is really better. Oil coolers are meant for thicker liquids; they don't have the same thermal efficiency with water because the passages are bigger and the water goes right through without giving up its heat.
The air/water intercooler itself is fairly $$, I've never figured out why though.
The air/water intercooler itself is fairly $$, I've never figured out why though.
#7
Re: Air to water, or Air to Air?
I always vote Air to Water if you are running hot air. Yeah air to air is easy and can be dirt cheap, but air to water isnt as "$$" as most thing. You can place the core anywhere you want vs in the front of the vehicle or an area of cool air flow- much less charge pipe to worry about. Its a million times easier to run 1" water lines threw an engine bay than it is to run bent metal 2-3" pipe. You can cool a charge much better with air to water due to the ease of iceing a reservoir.
All in all it just depends on budget, and what type of parts you are looking for. Yeah a bling water to air is going to be $$ but you could make one for cheaper than your off the shelf greedy/hks/etc. front mount kit.
Consider this one vote water to air, not to say I dont think air to air is efficent or smart, both have alot to say for themselves..
All in all it just depends on budget, and what type of parts you are looking for. Yeah a bling water to air is going to be $$ but you could make one for cheaper than your off the shelf greedy/hks/etc. front mount kit.
Consider this one vote water to air, not to say I dont think air to air is efficent or smart, both have alot to say for themselves..
#10
卐 Walnuts
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Compton, Ca W
Posts: 29,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Air to water, or Air to Air?
air to water i always thought of it being good for high HP drag cars or supercharged cars...you can just do AIR to AIR with the water spray or spray juice into the fmic