Notices
Cycle Corner Running with two less wheels than everyone else? This forum is for you.

Well....

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 07:29 AM
  #41  
CBR600F4's Avatar
Va Beach Coast Rider
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach
CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4
Default Re: Well....

Originally Posted by mnchvgs79
He is calling you a squid for riding without a jacket...

So lets get this straight... Everyone who rides without a jacket and gloves and full boots and blah blah blah is a squid? I find these implications that are made on this site so often to be funny, I was riding motorcycles WITHOUT A HELMET before 90% of the people on this website were even in middle school and here I am, still alive!

Do you street racer types wear a helmet, firesuit and have a full cage in your cars every single time you line up? Fuck no you don't.

Do you people who actually get laid from time to time, wear a condom every single time, never fail? Possible, but I doubt it.

Gear or lack thereof does not make you a "squid", riding a motorcycle because its the cool thing to do, makes you a squid, lying to people about the 120 mph wheelie you did on your 00 R6 last week, makes you a squid.

:end rant:
Not positive; but I would wager that I was riding my 1977 Honda CB750 four K through the nice rolling hills of Connecticut long before you were hitting middle school my friend.

And ya, back then I didn't wear a helmet unless I had to. But I digress......



Most *kids* who get sportbikes without ever having ridden one are getting it because they think it's the cool thing to do. And wearing full gear doesn't fall into that cool category.

I could give a shit less what other people do; I just laugh my ass off when I see a dude wearing a sweat outfit wreck in front of me.............
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 07:58 AM
  #42  
The real Ryan's Avatar
Type-R; Tight Car
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,429
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
The real Ryan has disabled reputation
Default Re: Well....

Originally Posted by VADA9
Thanks, yea thats what i hear. The sale was kind of weird circa. but i was complety honest about the bike. It was a lot of personal work in it and i miss it alot! But theres always another. I just make me sad to hear it was trashed so quick.
I don't know who you heard all of that from..... I over shot a turn after coming up over a hill in New Kent. I got it down to about 30 mph or so before hitting the dirt. As soon as I hit the dirt I came off the bike and rolled but the bike made it back to the road and thats what did all the damage. Needs a front fairing, new speed screen, Right fairing and it cracked the starter/clutch cover. About $600 in parts and I'm going to paint it a nice solid blue. Nothing else on the bike got even a scratch.

I dont think you knew about this after selling me the bike but it has a minor electrical problem that effects the speedo (goes crazy after 70 mph). Did it ever do that when you owned it? I am starting to think its a fualty speedo. I can't seem to find any wrong wiring or fualty grounds....
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 08:14 AM
  #43  
mnchvgs79's Avatar
Custom User Title
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,084
Likes: 0
From: Beautiful New Hampshire
mnchvgs79 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Well....

Originally Posted by CBR600F4
Not positive; but I would wager that I was riding my 1977 Honda CB750 four K through the nice rolling hills of Connecticut long before you were hitting middle school my friend.

And ya, back then I didn't wear a helmet unless I had to. But I digress......



Most *kids* who get sportbikes without ever having ridden one are getting it because they think it's the cool thing to do. And wearing full gear doesn't fall into that cool category.

I could give a shit less what other people do; I just laugh my ass off when I see a dude wearing a sweat outfit wreck in front of me.............
You're 4 years older than me, so whatever that works out to be.... since I have no idea when you got your first bike, but for me it was my 17th birthday. Anyway.... thats all symantics.

My point was this, what you're wearing while you are riding really doesn't mean shit beyond what risk level you are willing to take. If you want to go out with nothing but sunglasses on, then so be it, its your perrogative, it doesnt make you any less of rider.


*Edit... this could be fun

Some things I would considered squidly:

1. Revving your bike sitting at a light, so everyone sees you, these things will idle, lay off the throttle.
2. Tires that are flat in the middle and shiny on the outside.
3. Stretched swing arms on bikes that have never been to the track.

Last edited by mnchvgs79; Nov 14, 2005 at 08:22 AM.
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 09:07 AM
  #44  
CBR600F4's Avatar
Va Beach Coast Rider
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach
CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4
Default Re: Well....

Originally Posted by mnchvgs79
Some things I would considered squidly:

1. Revving your bike sitting at a light, so everyone sees you, these things will idle, lay off the throttle.
2. Tires that are flat in the middle and shiny on the outside.
3. Stretched swing arms on bikes that have never been to the track.

Agreed.
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 09:36 AM
  #45  
VanillaThrilla's Avatar
wub wub wub wub
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 19,724
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
VanillaThrilla VanillaThrilla VanillaThrilla VanillaThrilla VanillaThrilla VanillaThrilla VanillaThrilla VanillaThrilla VanillaThrilla VanillaThrilla VanillaThrilla
Default Re: Well....

Originally Posted by CBR600F4
Agreed.
x2.

The stretched swingarm factor I could agree with or disagree with. Not a fan of the stretched swingarms personally, but I do know a few guys with stretched bikes that rarely ever hit the track. They have liter+ bikes and not only did it for looks, but they did it to keep the front wheel down during daily driving. As you said, that's there perrogative. I don't care if you choose not to wear gear, and I will not criticize you for it, so I damn sure don't expect to be criticized for my decision to wear what I wear. That's my decision.
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 11:17 AM
  #46  
D.Nick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,296
Likes: 0
From: Newport News
D.Nick has much to be proud ofD.Nick has much to be proud ofD.Nick has much to be proud ofD.Nick has much to be proud ofD.Nick has much to be proud ofD.Nick has much to be proud ofD.Nick has much to be proud ofD.Nick has much to be proud ofD.Nick has much to be proud ofD.Nick has much to be proud ofD.Nick has much to be proud of
Default Re: Well....

call me a ricer but i like the swing arm
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 11:27 AM
  #47  
mnchvgs79's Avatar
Custom User Title
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,084
Likes: 0
From: Beautiful New Hampshire
mnchvgs79 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Well....

Originally Posted by BMC
call me a ricer but i like the swing arm
To me, it has nothing to do with being a ricer, it has everything to do with ruining the functionality of an otherwise nice sport bike. Sport bikes are made to be tearing up the turns, not cruising with a half shell helmet on and a stretched swing arm. But I guess to each his own, if you want to buy a bike and stretch it so you can look cool, than so be it, its yours. (not really talking directly to you Derrick)
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 12:18 PM
  #48  
CBR600F4's Avatar
Va Beach Coast Rider
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach
CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4 CBR600F4
Default Re: Well....

Originally Posted by mnchvgs79
To me, it has nothing to do with being a ricer, it has everything to do with ruining the functionality of an otherwise nice sport bike. Sport bikes are made to be tearing up the turns, not cruising with a half shell helmet on and a stretched swing arm.
Again; agreed.





And any decent rider will/can learn to keep the nose down. A stretched swingarm on a street bike that rarely (if ever) see's a track is *usually* for someone who just wants to look cool ( I have NO IDEA who actually thinks that looks cool) or is compensating because he cant keep the nose down under hard acceleration.

Last edited by CBR600F4; Nov 14, 2005 at 12:22 PM.
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 01:04 PM
  #49  
VanillaThrilla's Avatar
wub wub wub wub
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 19,724
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
VanillaThrilla VanillaThrilla VanillaThrilla VanillaThrilla VanillaThrilla VanillaThrilla VanillaThrilla VanillaThrilla VanillaThrilla VanillaThrilla VanillaThrilla
Default Re: Well....

Originally Posted by CBR600F4
Again; agreed.





And any decent rider will/can learn to keep the nose down. A stretched swingarm on a street bike that rarely (if ever) see's a track is *usually* for someone who just wants to look cool ( I have NO IDEA who actually thinks that looks cool) or is compensating because he cant keep the nose down under hard acceleration.
Disagree.

One of them that rarely hits the track actually ran IIRC a 5.9 on his GSX-R 1000.. Granted, that's a 1/8th mile track, but that's fucking fast! He runs with me through the mountains and curvy roads, so either his riding ability extremely overcompensates the stretched swingarm, or it doesn't completely kill his handling.

Another one has been riding for at least 10 years and he's got a GSX-R 1000 too.. On the drag strip, his front wheel is in the air almost the entire time and it's not because of his riding ability.. he's one hell of a good rider. That one, obviously, is not stretched. That's with a full gas tank and him laying with all of his weight being forward.

You can stretch/extend a swingarm without totally ruining the handling characteristics. If handling is your primary concern, a huge stretch is obviously not a good idea.. but I've seen stretched bikes that were only extended maybe 3-4 inches and it looked good and still handled great. I've seen some bikes that had to have been stretched like 8 inches just for show, maybe more.. when the rear tire sticks out behind the tail-light.. that, to me, is tacky. Use moderation if you're going to stretch it out, PLEASE.. D.
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 01:57 PM
  #50  
D.Nick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,296
Likes: 0
From: Newport News
D.Nick has much to be proud ofD.Nick has much to be proud ofD.Nick has much to be proud ofD.Nick has much to be proud ofD.Nick has much to be proud ofD.Nick has much to be proud ofD.Nick has much to be proud ofD.Nick has much to be proud ofD.Nick has much to be proud ofD.Nick has much to be proud ofD.Nick has much to be proud of
Default Re: Well....

Originally Posted by ZeRo_c0oL@work
Disagree.

One of them that rarely hits the track actually ran IIRC a 5.9 on his GSX-R 1000.. Granted, that's a 1/8th mile track, but that's fucking fast! He runs with me through the mountains and curvy roads, so either his riding ability extremely overcompensates the stretched swingarm, or it doesn't completely kill his handling.

Another one has been riding for at least 10 years and he's got a GSX-R 1000 too.. On the drag strip, his front wheel is in the air almost the entire time and it's not because of his riding ability.. he's one hell of a good rider. That one, obviously, is not stretched. That's with a full gas tank and him laying with all of his weight being forward.

You can stretch/extend a swingarm without totally ruining the handling characteristics. If handling is your primary concern, a huge stretch is obviously not a good idea.. but I've seen stretched bikes that were only extended maybe 3-4 inches and it looked good and still handled great. I've seen some bikes that had to have been stretched like 8 inches just for show, maybe more.. when the rear tire sticks out behind the tail-light.. that, to me, is tacky. Use moderation if you're going to stretch it out, PLEASE.. D.

Okie doke.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:43 AM.