Turbo vs Supercharger
I'm going to re-iterate what on what Fabrik8 is saying. Its not necessarily about your compression ratio, rather its about the dynamic cylinder pressures. Its ALSO about reaching that limit in the most efficient way possible. For example, you might have a motor with an 8.0:1 that you can run say 20 lbs of boost. OR you can have the same motor with a 10:1 ratio and only run 12 lbs of boost. Now you need to consider ambiatic efficienies. On setup a (20psi) the turbo may be running at 62% efficiency, where as setup b (12psi) will be running at 76% efficieny. Superchargers (centrifugal style) usually max out around 80% efficiency peak. You're dealing with curves, NOT straight lines in forced induction. The goal is to match your needs/purpose, to that peak.
I wanted to make sure that everyone understood that the engine and turbo efficiencies are separate entities...
Efficiency of the engine from a having a certain compression ratio doesn't have to do with the efficiency of the turbo. The efficiency of the turbo has to do with where it is operating within its efficiency range (and is a characteristic of th turbo itself), which is different at 12PSI, 20PSI, etc.. The compression ratio of the engine affects the volumetric efficiency of the engine.. You can make more power with the same amount of boost on a higher compression engine, etc.
However, the vol eff of the engine does have a big role when calculating a target HP and choosing which turbo to use. The vol eff has a role in how much boost you will need to reach a certain target HP, which then leads to the turbo selection (based on the turbo's eff characteristics). But I digress..
As an afterthought, a turbo can (will) increase the vol eff of an engine. So engine eff doesn't affect the turbo, but the turbo affects the engines' eff...
Last edited by Fabrik8; Jun 12, 2007 at 04:24 PM.
6 or 8 PSI often doesn't need any upgrading if there is enough overhead from the factory. Blindly replacing things is expensive and often unnecessary.
Re: Turbo vs Supercharger
I have always wondered about the fuel system. So basicly i can just slap on a SuperCharger with 6 psi and thats all? For the M3 BMW of course. And if i want a little more power out of it, ill just add a intercooler and upgrade the fuel system?
Oh yeah, what about the fuel pump?
I have always wondered about the fuel system. So basicly i can just slap on a SuperCharger with 6 psi and thats all? For the M3 BMW of course. And if i want a little more power out of it, ill just add a intercooler and upgrade the fuel system?
Oh yeah, what about the fuel pump?
Oh yeah, what about the fuel pump?
Lets say you have a motor that has 9.0:1 compression that can only handle say 10psi of boost before it wants to pop. Now you have a supercharger that runs at 76% adiabatic efficieny (thanks fabrik8) at 10psi. Now say you have a turbo instead of a supercharger. Now at 10psi, this turbo is running at 62% adiabatic efficiency. That means, its putting more restriction on the exhaust/motor causing you to have less efficient of a system and LESS HORSEPOWER.
Always huh?
Lets say you have a motor that has 9.0:1 compression that can only handle say 10psi of boost before it wants to pop. Now you have a supercharger that runs at 76% adiabatic efficieny (thanks fabrik8) at 10psi. Now say you have a turbo instead of a supercharger. Now at 10psi, this turbo is running at 62% adiabatic efficiency. That means, its putting more restriction on the exhaust/motor causing you to have less efficient of a system and LESS HORSEPOWER.
Lets say you have a motor that has 9.0:1 compression that can only handle say 10psi of boost before it wants to pop. Now you have a supercharger that runs at 76% adiabatic efficieny (thanks fabrik8) at 10psi. Now say you have a turbo instead of a supercharger. Now at 10psi, this turbo is running at 62% adiabatic efficiency. That means, its putting more restriction on the exhaust/motor causing you to have less efficient of a system and LESS HORSEPOWER.








