Notices
Tech Talk Anything technically related to your vehicle should be posted here. If you're looking to have work done, try one of the Regional Forums.

Turbo vs Supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 03:18 PM
  #31  
Fabrik8's Avatar
Racetracks
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,668
Likes: 0
From: How long is a piece of string?
Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8
Default Re: Turbo vs Supercharger

It's adiabatic efficiency, you were close though..

Originally Posted by RandomTask
LoL - god you people are so ignorant.
Now you see my crusade here every day.. I just don't come out and say it like that.. lol..
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 03:46 PM
  #32  
Fabrik8's Avatar
Racetracks
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,668
Likes: 0
From: How long is a piece of string?
Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8
Default Re: Turbo vs Supercharger

Originally Posted by RandomTask
I'm going to re-iterate what on what Fabrik8 is saying. Its not necessarily about your compression ratio, rather its about the dynamic cylinder pressures. Its ALSO about reaching that limit in the most efficient way possible. For example, you might have a motor with an 8.0:1 that you can run say 20 lbs of boost. OR you can have the same motor with a 10:1 ratio and only run 12 lbs of boost. Now you need to consider ambiatic efficienies. On setup a (20psi) the turbo may be running at 62% efficiency, where as setup b (12psi) will be running at 76% efficieny. Superchargers (centrifugal style) usually max out around 80% efficiency peak. You're dealing with curves, NOT straight lines in forced induction. The goal is to match your needs/purpose, to that peak.
I was slightly confused by what you said, then I realized what you were trying to say (and I was over analyzing it of course)..
I wanted to make sure that everyone understood that the engine and turbo efficiencies are separate entities...

Efficiency of the engine from a having a certain compression ratio doesn't have to do with the efficiency of the turbo. The efficiency of the turbo has to do with where it is operating within its efficiency range (and is a characteristic of th turbo itself), which is different at 12PSI, 20PSI, etc.. The compression ratio of the engine affects the volumetric efficiency of the engine.. You can make more power with the same amount of boost on a higher compression engine, etc.

However, the vol eff of the engine does have a big role when calculating a target HP and choosing which turbo to use. The vol eff has a role in how much boost you will need to reach a certain target HP, which then leads to the turbo selection (based on the turbo's eff characteristics). But I digress..

As an afterthought, a turbo can (will) increase the vol eff of an engine. So engine eff doesn't affect the turbo, but the turbo affects the engines' eff...

Last edited by Fabrik8; Jun 12, 2007 at 04:24 PM.
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 05:12 PM
  #33  
JSL1CE's Avatar
standalonecomplex
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,372
Likes: 0
From: Alexandria, VA
JSL1CE is infamous around these partsJSL1CE is infamous around these partsJSL1CE is infamous around these partsJSL1CE is infamous around these partsJSL1CE is infamous around these partsJSL1CE is infamous around these partsJSL1CE is infamous around these partsJSL1CE is infamous around these partsJSL1CE is infamous around these partsJSL1CE is infamous around these partsJSL1CE is infamous around these parts
Default Re: Turbo vs Supercharger

I didnt read the whole thing but I will say this: if youre going to run any type of FI, the first thing you need to do is upgrade your fuel system.
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 05:19 PM
  #34  
Fabrik8's Avatar
Racetracks
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,668
Likes: 0
From: How long is a piece of string?
Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8
Default Re: Turbo vs Supercharger

6 or 8 PSI often doesn't need any upgrading if there is enough overhead from the factory. Blindly replacing things is expensive and often unnecessary.
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 05:32 AM
  #35  
beem3r's Avatar
Thread Starter
Yamaha :) vrooom!
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
beem3r has disabled reputation
Re: Turbo vs Supercharger

Originally Posted by Fabrik8
6 or 8 PSI often doesn't need any upgrading if there is enough overhead from the factory. Blindly replacing things is expensive and often unnecessary.

I have always wondered about the fuel system. So basicly i can just slap on a SuperCharger with 6 psi and thats all? For the M3 BMW of course. And if i want a little more power out of it, ill just add a intercooler and upgrade the fuel system?

Oh yeah, what about the fuel pump?
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 05:59 AM
  #36  
Mid Atlantic Performance's Avatar
Registered Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Mid Atlantic Performance is a jewel in the roughMid Atlantic Performance is a jewel in the roughMid Atlantic Performance is a jewel in the roughMid Atlantic Performance is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Turbo vs Supercharger

Originally Posted by RandomTask
LoL - god you people are so ignorant.
really, if im so ignorant why dont you explain to me why i am wrong?
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 06:09 AM
  #37  
Nic's Avatar
Nic
Patron
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,706
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield
Nic Nic Nic Nic Nic Nic Nic Nic Nic Nic Nic
Default Re: Turbo vs Supercharger

Originally Posted by crazzylegs
really, if im so ignorant why dont you explain to me why i am wrong?
I'd love to hear this explanation also. I think Mike's probably built more fast cars than the rest of the posters in this thread combined.
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 07:24 AM
  #38  
Fabrik8's Avatar
Racetracks
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,668
Likes: 0
From: How long is a piece of string?
Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8
Default Re: Turbo vs Supercharger

Originally Posted by beem3r
I have always wondered about the fuel system. So basicly i can just slap on a SuperCharger with 6 psi and thats all? For the M3 BMW of course. And if i want a little more power out of it, ill just add a intercooler and upgrade the fuel system?

Oh yeah, what about the fuel pump?
You should be fine, fuel pump, injectors, everything. Again, try to get some info from other M3 owners and see what kind of fuel system headroom you'll have. As far as slapping a supercharger on, not a big deal. Adding an intercooler later though, that's a little different unless you're using a centrifugal unit like Vortec. Most roots or Eaton superchargers replace the stock intake manifold, and there really isn't any way to easily add a intercooler. These are the considerations you have to think about when you're planning out what to do for more power though.
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 07:27 AM
  #39  
RandomTask's Avatar
Registered member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,252
Likes: 0
RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask
Default Re: Turbo vs Supercharger

Originally Posted by crazzylegs
all things being = a turbo will allways make more hp then a supercharger will.
Always huh?

Lets say you have a motor that has 9.0:1 compression that can only handle say 10psi of boost before it wants to pop. Now you have a supercharger that runs at 76% adiabatic efficieny (thanks fabrik8) at 10psi. Now say you have a turbo instead of a supercharger. Now at 10psi, this turbo is running at 62% adiabatic efficiency. That means, its putting more restriction on the exhaust/motor causing you to have less efficient of a system and LESS HORSEPOWER.
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 07:41 AM
  #40  
Mid Atlantic Performance's Avatar
Registered Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Mid Atlantic Performance is a jewel in the roughMid Atlantic Performance is a jewel in the roughMid Atlantic Performance is a jewel in the roughMid Atlantic Performance is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Turbo vs Supercharger

Originally Posted by RandomTask
Always huh?

Lets say you have a motor that has 9.0:1 compression that can only handle say 10psi of boost before it wants to pop. Now you have a supercharger that runs at 76% adiabatic efficieny (thanks fabrik8) at 10psi. Now say you have a turbo instead of a supercharger. Now at 10psi, this turbo is running at 62% adiabatic efficiency. That means, its putting more restriction on the exhaust/motor causing you to have less efficient of a system and LESS HORSEPOWER.
yes allways, maybe when you get your head out of your ass and get into the real world you will understand. any supercharger takes hp to make hp period. yes a turbo is not persay "Free" power. but it takes a hell of alot less to make hp than a supercharger does. ofcourse the size of the turbo/supercharger + boost levels + intercoolers come into play. BUT all things being = A TURBO WILL ALLWAYS MAKE MORE HP!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:06 AM.