not sure where you got your numbers from but I will play along.

Evo IX MR: 0-60: 4.5 seconds traction: Owns 350Z
Subaru WRX STI: 0-60: 4.5 seconds traction: also owns 350Z

Work Cited:
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ecs_price.html

 

lol.

 

You are more than welcome to say it to my face along with some of the few lancers owners out there... You live in Sterling...just come out to Chic Fil A on fri night. Not sure where you think we are some uneducated High School Punk...I am more than welcome to show you my diplomaS if it pleases you. Judging by the cars that you own...you sound like a arrogant punk that finally got a nice car and thinks he rules the world. You didnt even get a top of the line one at that...what kind of "baller" is that.

I have nothing against people that are enthusiastic about their vehicles, but you are another breed.

 

2003 Nissan 350z 5.4 14.1 . Now lets look at some weight reduction by year 2004. 2004 Nissan 350Z 5.3 13.77 (M.T. Mar '04) That's an old edition too. The 2006 edition has another 20HP making it 300HP. Now the new 2007 has 306HP and lighter than both editions. So this is why 350Z > EVO. Rest assured, I complete my case. I'm glad you brought it up and I compared it for you like that.

Work Cited: http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html CNTRL + F = 350Z

 

People who can't argue using their brain and facts, challenge others to fight. This is a great example of that theory.

 

Have you ever even been to a 1/4 mile track with your "luxurious" sportscar?

 

You have never driven an evo have you?

You're also arguing that a boosted car with slightly less CRANK hp(286hp) that's awd is inferior to an NA car (306hp) that's rwd in a quarter mile?

 

LOL.....Go edit your post again, since you obviously can't make a complete thought without posting then editing. Anyhow, since I'm uneducated and broke, as you say, I'll just say that I've owned 2 EVO's, and though they are expensive to maintain, they are amazing cars. The only reason I traded my last one in was to get the new SI four door. Yes, there are those who buy an affordable sports car, but that doesn't make them any different than you. The sheer fact that you've posted what you have makes you just as "ricey" as everyone else (I love how everything is referred to as "rice"). If you find it offensive and have nothing to say other than to talk $h@t about others cars, stay off the site. No one makes you come to this "rice" site anyway. I could care less what you drive, how much money you have, nor what you think of some HS kid that challenges your manhood wanting to race you. The question presented was and opinion about the STI VS EVO, neither of with you own. MMMM...........
Anyway, I prefer the EVO. I've owned several DSM's so that is my only reason. I just know them better.

 

I never said anything about fighting...I just want to see if you have the balls to say it in public. I am giving you an opportunity to save face and meet some and get to know some people before you make any more generalizations. Dont make assumptions about someone's academic achievement before getting to know them...it may come back to bite you in the rear end.

Please enlighten me on the logic you are using.

You quote Crank HP...What are you putting down to the ground? What is your ET and what are you trapping?

 

I gaurantee he has NO IDEA.