red mustang on 288 this morning?
02-18-2007, 12:32 PM
#21
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: red mustang on 288 this morning?
Most humbling experience ever for me in Richmond consisted of me getting absolutely demolished by some guy in a red civic ex with flame stickers on the windows (h22, turbo, and probably more shit, IIRC he said upper 11s when I caught up to him). shortly after seeing taillights I stopped laughing at the flame stickers for a bit. 
That sucked.
That sucked.
02-18-2007, 03:29 PM
#23
Desolation
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ashburn
Posts: 5,148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: red mustang on 288 this morning?
Turbo/supercharged and spraying? As you may have noticed, my little thingy says "h22a" which most likely means, my honda has an h22a. I'll cut you some slack here, since most muscle car owners who've challenged me didn't really like honda, therefore didnt bother learning about honda motors. However, lemme give you some background. The h22a has 200bhp. H22a prelude with i/h/e and tuned properly should run about 14 flat with a lil over 200whp (yes, they weigh very little). Boosted H22 is a whole different story. Run 9 psi, and you cant expect anything less than 300 whp. In order to spray and turbo/supercharge, the motor would have to be built, since it has a 10.6:1 CR. So basically, when you say that my prelude would have to be sprayed and boosted to beat your mustang, I hope you're running low 12s or 11s to back that up. Granted, my h22a is neither boosted nor sprayed, so it only runs 14s, but I still think unless ur mustang is modded, I'd have a good shot at total ownage
With that being said, do not mistake this post for me saying my car is fast lol, I know that my car is prolly one of the slower ones on this forum, im just saying... think before you post.
With that being said, do not mistake this post for me saying my car is fast lol, I know that my car is prolly one of the slower ones on this forum, im just saying... think before you post.
Stock 99-04 GTs will run 14.0 or faster with a good driver.
02-18-2007, 03:41 PM
#24
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: red mustang on 288 this morning?
Cool. They can run with mid 80's early 90s L98 Firebirds.
Yup. Thats worth mentioning.
I mean, it took Ford til 05 to build a GT that could consistently beat LT1 cars.
Yup. Thats worth mentioning.
I mean, it took Ford til 05 to build a GT that could consistently beat LT1 cars.
02-18-2007, 03:59 PM
#25
Registered Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: red mustang on 288 this morning?
Judging on previous experiences though, I still stick to my total ownage of this '00 GT previously posted.
Last edited by Lars; 02-18-2007 at 04:05 PM.
02-18-2007, 04:21 PM
#26
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: mechanicsville
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02-18-2007, 04:43 PM
#27
Slow as Shit
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Short Pump
Posts: 10,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: red mustang on 288 this morning?
02-18-2007, 06:19 PM
#30
life is good boosted
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: red mustang on 288 this morning?
L98 cars run like they're tied to a tree. Bone stock LT1 cars run 14's...low 14's but still 14's. LS1 cars are indeed fast even stock but I fail to see the superiority complex necessary from LowTech1. There is after all, always something faster.....