New Challenger?
#12
Re: New Challenger?
Soooo lame how they called it a 570 because it's a 5.7 liter. This isn't some euro car, the number should be the cubic inches, and it should still be 570.
#14
GLHF
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 5,184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#16
V NewYearsResolution
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Mechanicsville VA
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: New Challenger?
By far the only Challenger I would buy. I love the look but they're too dam heavy. This version of the Challenger is like comparing the Mustang GT to the Shelby though, I'm sure the price is incredibly impractical.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dj5nLgcKlFs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dj5nLgcKlFs
#18
Poop Ban-nana owns U
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: 2,601 miles from my house.
Posts: 5,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#20
Jive Turkey
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 4,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: New Challenger?
That's actually not too bad. About as much as a Supra and only 50lbs more than the M3. Not sure why they used the 5.7....probably could have gotten 500hp from bolt ons with the 6.1. A cool car nonetheless...even if it is a boat. It's a cruiser, not a roadster, and it's great for that.