Notices
Automotive Discussion Automotive talk that is not technical can be posted here. Posts must address the general population.

S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 07:46 PM
  #221  
Brian T's Avatar
Kicking Ass
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,026
Likes: 0
From: HAAF, GA/RVA
Brian T Brian T Brian T Brian T Brian T Brian T
Default Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO

Well since it looks like you AutoX, Leelo, lets take this from SCCAs point of view. Can you change tires in still be in stock class? Yes. Can you reduce weight and still be in stock class? No.

Oh look at his R/T too. Unless he was just taking his time at the line, it's pretty obvious the guy can't drive.
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 07:50 PM
  #222  
leolo007's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
From: Philly
leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007
Default Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO

Originally Posted by XCELR8
you never answered me

does a 13.3 suck balls? you said all Mustangs in stock form suck balls.
no thats not bad at all, and if that is your time then even better! and I didnt say all mustangs suck balls in stock form, I said GT's and that is also relative, but it is my opinion
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 07:51 PM
  #223  
Woodrow's Avatar
Slow as Shit
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,172
Likes: 0
From: Short Pump
Woodrow Woodrow Woodrow Woodrow Woodrow Woodrow Woodrow Woodrow Woodrow Woodrow Woodrow
Default Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO

Originally Posted by leolo007
actually I took the liberty of visiting the page and I saw these interesting things:
19....12.36@108.5....1.62....Joe-Stang............99GT
so this one must be stock too huh??

and then I keep going down and I see this:
99 GT 5speed

R/T ... .947
60 .... 2.14
330... 6.0
1/8.... 9.2
MPH... 76.5
1000.. 11.9
1/4.... 14.2
MPH... 97.02

MODS:

Tri-Ax,King Cobra Clutch,Firewall Adj,Timing Adj@14*,Steeda U/D Pullies, MAC CAI, Nitto 555R D/R, Mac o/r H with 2chamber Flowmasters



and that one is posted as stock on your list
That's nice you read his signiature. Mine reads more mods in it as well than what was on my ET.
Here is the ET List catagory
Let me know of any updates, mistakes or suggestions. PM, post or e-mail.

#..........¼......................60?...........na me.......car.............spare info.
Hmmm one would read spare info means what mods did you have at the time of the run Many peoples mods in their sigs are different from that of the ET list.

STOCK??? ok, I have official stopped believing anything you say. and you say I live in an unrealistic world
Ok get on aim and ask Johnnyb2kGT that his stock 00 spring feature GT with a radial tire did not run a 13.9 ET in the summer. Hell a buddy ran his g/f's automatic Gt to a 14.3. The sad thing is I was there as was Nic who also can vouch for that time you horses ass. You fail to realize many of these times I refer to as being seen, are my friends. Which means i know the car very well, seen it or raced against it. Not only have you failed to provide times of slow mustangs that you know of, or personally witnessed, but I have personally witnessed plenty running 13's. Stop being a magazine racer, and get your ass out to a track and 1 log some real times, or 2 shut the fuck up because you have no clue what you are even talking about.
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 07:53 PM
  #224  
leolo007's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
From: Philly
leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007
Default Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO

Originally Posted by Brian T
Well since it looks like you AutoX, Leelo, lets take this from SCCAs point of view. Can you change tires in still be in stock class? Yes. Can you reduce weight and still be in stock class? No.

Oh look at his R/T too. Unless he was just taking his time at the line, it's pretty obvious the guy can't drive.
hahahahahaha, now you are taking autocross rules and applying them to drag racing... please keep them comming
besides what we are talking about there are no official rules, if you want to believe a 1/4 mile time for a stock car with radial tires, as the stock 1/4 mile time of the car, good for you. I dont.
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 07:55 PM
  #225  
Brock Obama's Avatar
Srsly.
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 0
From: Kalamazoo
Brock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these parts
Default Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO

Originally Posted by leolo007
no thats not bad at all, and if that is your time then even better! and I didnt say all mustangs suck balls in stock form, I said GT's and that is also relative, but it is my opinion
ohhh, okay.
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 07:56 PM
  #226  
Brock Obama's Avatar
Srsly.
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 0
From: Kalamazoo
Brock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these parts
Default Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO

Originally Posted by leolo007
hahahahahaha, now you are taking autocross rules and applying them to drag racing... please keep them comming
besides what we are talking about there are no official rules, if you want to believe a 1/4 mile time for a stock car with radial tires, as the stock 1/4 mile time of the car, good for you. I dont.
does a K&N air filter still count as stock? If it doesn't, then I lied to you. My 13.3 was done with a K&N.
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 07:59 PM
  #227  
Brian T's Avatar
Kicking Ass
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,026
Likes: 0
From: HAAF, GA/RVA
Brian T Brian T Brian T Brian T Brian T Brian T
Default Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO

Originally Posted by leolo007
hahahahahaha, now you are taking autocross rules and applying them to drag racing... please keep them comming
besides what we are talking about there are no official rules, if you want to believe a 1/4 mile time for a stock car with radial tires, as the stock 1/4 mile time of the car, good for you. I dont.
No I'm just showing you that even the SCCA looks at weight reduction differently then switching tires. I mean do you really expect everybody to still be rolling on the tires they got from the dealer 5 years ago?
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 08:03 PM
  #228  
leolo007's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
From: Philly
leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007
Default Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO

Originally Posted by Woodrow
That's nice you read his signiature. Mine reads more mods in it as well than what was on my ET.
Here is the ET List catagory
Let me know of any updates, mistakes or suggestions. PM, post or e-mail.

#..........¼......................60?...........na me.......car.............spare info.
Hmmm one would read spare info means what mods did you have at the time of the run Many peoples mods in their sigs are different from that of the ET list.

Ok get on aim and ask Johnnyb2kGT that his stock 00 spring feature GT with a radial tire did not run a 13.9 ET in the summer. Hell a buddy ran his g/f's automatic Gt to a 14.3. The sad thing is I was there as was Nic who also can vouch for that time you horses ass. You fail to realize many of these times I refer to as being seen, are my friends. Which means i know the car very well, seen it or raced against it. Not only have you failed to provide times of slow mustangs that you know of, or personally witnessed, but I have personally witnessed plenty running 13's. Stop being a magazine racer, and get your ass out to a track and 1 log some real times, or 2 shut the fuck up because you have no clue what you are even talking about.
man look at the rest of the list that you provided as proof, is this guy stock?
19....12.36@108.5....1.62....Joe-Stang............99GT
in fact look at the rest of them, most of them dont include mods...
and you want proof of slow mustangs?
you gave me the proof yourself on that list you gave...

and honestly I cant remember the last time that I went to the track and saw a stock msutang run, but I do remember the last time I saw a modified mustang run 14's. and the rest of my experience is the mustang owners who think I am another slow ass civic, and I beat them, when I ran 14.3s.
and if I got beat it was by an obviously modified mustang.

and sorry but its getting late and I gotta work tomorrow... or today I mean.
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 08:04 PM
  #229  
leolo007's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
From: Philly
leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007
Default Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO

Originally Posted by Brian T
No I'm just showing you that even the SCCA looks at weight reduction differently then switching tires. I mean do you really expect everybody to still be rolling on the tires they got from the dealer 5 years ago?
I did
race on regular street tires that is
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 08:05 PM
  #230  
leolo007's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
From: Philly
leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007 leolo007
Default Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO

Originally Posted by XCELR8
ohhh, okay.
well Im glad could settle this arguement in peace



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:37 PM.