S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Thread Starter
Registered Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
I have never seen a stock mustang gt running 13s, in fact I have never lost to a stock or even mildly modded mustang gt with my 14.3 second civic from roll or from a stop. yeah Im sure they're out there but I have personally never seen them.
another thing, Im not defending the turbos2k guy because I think he's a fag, and has a very low self esteem and builds a hot car to make friends. but about his time, I think in this case and every case trap speed should be presented when posting 1/4 mile times, with that you can generally determine the potential of the car if it had a good launch off the line.
I have seen a car run low low 14's at X mph, and chop a complete second off with good tires at same mph trap speed.
another thing, Im not defending the turbos2k guy because I think he's a fag, and has a very low self esteem and builds a hot car to make friends. but about his time, I think in this case and every case trap speed should be presented when posting 1/4 mile times, with that you can generally determine the potential of the car if it had a good launch off the line.
I have seen a car run low low 14's at X mph, and chop a complete second off with good tires at same mph trap speed.
Registered member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,781
Likes: 0
From: Oahu, HI
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by Flite
And with that statement you've lost all credibility...
S2000s are one of the funnest cars that money can buy.
S2000s are one of the funnest cars that money can buy.
Registered Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
From: Hampton
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by leolo007
I have never seen a stock mustang gt running 13s, in fact I have never lost to a stock or even mildly modded mustang gt with my 14.3 second civic from roll or from a stop. yeah Im sure they're out there but I have personally never seen them.
another thing, Im not defending the turbos2k guy because I think he's a fag, and has a very low self esteem and builds a hot car to make friends. but about his time, I think in this case and every case trap speed should be presented when posting 1/4 mile times, with that you can generally determine the potential of the car if it had a good launch off the line.
I have seen a car run low low 14's at X mph, and chop a complete second off with good tires at same mph trap speed.
another thing, Im not defending the turbos2k guy because I think he's a fag, and has a very low self esteem and builds a hot car to make friends. but about his time, I think in this case and every case trap speed should be presented when posting 1/4 mile times, with that you can generally determine the potential of the car if it had a good launch off the line.
I have seen a car run low low 14's at X mph, and chop a complete second off with good tires at same mph trap speed.
Slow as Shit
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,172
Likes: 0
From: Short Pump
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by leolo007
I have never seen a stock mustang gt running 13s, in fact I have never lost to a stock or even mildly modded mustang gt with my 14.3 second civic from roll or from a stop. yeah Im sure they're out there but I have personally never seen them.
I have seen several stock GT's run 13's. I am on over 5 different mustang sites and see them there all the time. Just because your neck of the woods doesnt have them, doesn't mean the mainstream doesn't.
Registered member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,972
Likes: 0
From: Winchester
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by Digger70chall
um once again you are too busy spouting crap to see what i posted...i didn't mention a v8 in there at all
cliff notes for the Nova (weez are the baddest str33t rAc3rs evAr)
modded SRT-4 >>>> modded s2k
if 400HP is the best that can be done I feel sorry for owners who mod em. Now they are nice cars for what they are.
On a side note:
my 440ci > your TT
cliff notes for the Nova (weez are the baddest str33t rAc3rs evAr)
modded SRT-4 >>>> modded s2k
if 400HP is the best that can be done I feel sorry for owners who mod em. Now they are nice cars for what they are.
On a side note:
my 440ci > your TT
What are you trying to say? you wanna run my TT? :
:
Registered member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,972
Likes: 0
From: Winchester
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by jester
I dunno, I think his car is nice and thats cool that he built it up and everything. But honestly, I really don't care much for people acting like an elitist asshole just because of what they have. I think myself and many others would have a lot more respect if he was slightly more humble instead of trying to think he's better than everyone becuase of a car. In my eyes, having a turbo S2K isn't an excuse to be a cocky fucker, sorry. But that's just me.
Now I agree... when your less cocky you do seem to get more respect and more people like you. Good point.
Registered member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,972
Likes: 0
From: Winchester
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by gyl
umm wrong...a 900-1000 hp v8 run's well into the 8's....that is 6-5 seconds faster than stock...a huge gain.so you tell me how a 450-500 hp s2000 only getting a gain of 2 seconds over stock is the same?how about learn something before you post.and if you wanna talk about what i drive....i have 2 stangs...one is a extremely high hp car.that's how i know your little comparison doesn't work here bud.
you took that wrong... way wrong look at what I said.
He has a 250hp car from factory it now makes 500.
Thats like you guys who make 350hp from factory making 700
Same concept i may of over did or said it but thats what i ment.
Slow as Shit
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,172
Likes: 0
From: Short Pump
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by Jason300zxTT
you took that wrong... way wrong look at what I said.
He has a 250hp car from factory it now makes 500.
Thats like you guys who make 350hp from factory making 700
Same concept i may of over did or said it but thats what i ment.
He has a 250hp car from factory it now makes 500.
Thats like you guys who make 350hp from factory making 700
Same concept i may of over did or said it but thats what i ment.
Registered member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,972
Likes: 0
From: Winchester
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by Woodrow
Yes but he runs 11.9 with 2800 pounds. He should be ALOT faster. That's why many are not impressed. You can take a LS1 and with more weight and less mods and hp still ran faster.
Who runs 11.9?
Shaun "BLACKTURBOS2K" I dont belive has ever ran a 11.9 yet. the only person with a Turbo S2k I KNOW of that ran a 11.9 was the owner of inline pro a guy named Jon and he let off towards the end and trapped at 112 mph Shaun's black turbo s2k trapped at like 118 one time and i think 122 the next. So the speeds are more then enough to run mid to low 11's. But running on kumo ecsta tires dosent help a s2k to much and O yea the shitty axles and rear ends they run.
Registered Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
From: Hampton
Re: S2K beat in hp/liter production engine = SSC AERO
Originally Posted by Woodrow
It helps if you go to the dragstrip. I have seen several stock GT's run 13's. I am on over 5 different mustang sites and see them there all the time. Just because your neck of the woods doesnt have them, doesn't mean the mainstream doesn't.
I have seen several stock GT's run 13's. I am on over 5 different mustang sites and see them there all the time. Just because your neck of the woods doesnt have them, doesn't mean the mainstream doesn't.Psssst....www.fordpower.net/forums
