Modified Ford GT dyno
#21
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Richmond
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Modified Ford GT dyno
Originally Posted by Dr. 4.6
A Kenne Belle GT would be sick.
#23
i got 5 on it
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: voting booth
Posts: 14,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Modified Ford GT dyno
Originally Posted by zx12guy
Are you saying KB> whipple? Not sure the displacement on the whipple used on the GT but I thought they were very comparable to KB's. If not a hair more efficient.
#24
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Richmond
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Modified Ford GT dyno
Originally Posted by spic
kb only makes one size sc?
#26
Re: Modified Ford GT dyno
Originally Posted by zx12guy
Are you saying KB> whipple? Not sure the displacement on the whipple used on the GT but I thought they were very comparable to KB's. If not a hair more efficient.
#28
VaDriven Mayhem
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Where the faggles are.
Posts: 21,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Modified Ford GT dyno
Originally Posted by Dr. 4.6
The KB 2.4 is a little better than Whipple 2.3 unit. Both are great. The whipple is better than the 2.2 KB.
For a daily driver the 2.2 is a better deal
#29
Re: Modified Ford GT dyno
Originally Posted by NFCstang
BUt the KB 2.4 is about useless on the street unless you're running 20+lbs of boost.
For a daily driver the 2.2 is a better deal
For a daily driver the 2.2 is a better deal
#30
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Richmond
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Modified Ford GT dyno
Originally Posted by Dr. 4.6
The KB 2.4 is a little better than Whipple 2.3 unit. Both are great. The whipple is better than the 2.2 KB.