Edmund's First Drive: 2005 Mustang GT
10-03-2004, 05:16 PM
#21
Srsly.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kalamazoo
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Edmund's First Drive: 2005 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by MM&FF
In conclusion, I think you'll find that both cars hit the target audience. The Mach 1 puts an exclamation point on a strong model run, while the GTO breathes new life into a division of GM that really needed a hot rod. Better yet is the fact that both cars are fast and the competition will only breed better cars for us in the future. We hear there's a hood scoop coming for the GTO next year and rumor has it that '05 Mustangs are making 290-295 rwhp from their three-valve 4.6s in clandestine testing.
Good luck to Pontiac, but on this day the Ford was the top dog.
Good luck to Pontiac, but on this day the Ford was the top dog.
http://www.musclemustangfastfords.co...s/0407mm_mach/
Last edited by Brock Obama; 10-03-2004 at 05:23 PM.
10-03-2004, 05:16 PM
#22
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hampton
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Edmund's First Drive: 2005 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by XCELR8
I'm at work and I don't have scanner.
Yea, even tho its on a Mustang Dyno, I dont see it pulling even 270 on a dynojet.
10-03-2004, 05:18 PM
#23
Srsly.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kalamazoo
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Edmund's First Drive: 2005 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by Soon2BeStangin
Sorry its so small..
10-03-2004, 05:19 PM
#24
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hampton
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Edmund's First Drive: 2005 Mustang GT
...rumor has it that '05 Mustangs are making 290-295 rwhp from their three-valve 4.6s in clandestine testing.
10-03-2004, 05:20 PM
#25
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hampton
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Edmund's First Drive: 2005 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by XCELR8
Thats on a "Mustang" Dynomometer, there always off and show rating much different than that of a dynojet dynomometer.
and what you call off, some people refer to as more realistic.
10-03-2004, 05:21 PM
#26
Srsly.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kalamazoo
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Edmund's First Drive: 2005 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by Soon2BeStangin
See the edit...
and what you call off, some people refer to as more realistic.
and what you call off, some people refer to as more realistic.
10-03-2004, 05:23 PM
#27
Srsly.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kalamazoo
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Edmund's First Drive: 2005 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by XCELR8
I beat you too it. Believe me now?
10-03-2004, 05:24 PM
#28
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hampton
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Edmund's First Drive: 2005 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by XCELR8
90% of the world goes by Dynojet. Thats a small portion your refering to.
I would think it should pull about 280 on a dynojet. Which would make sense seeing how the automatic ran a 13.6.
10-03-2004, 05:28 PM
#30
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Williamsburg
Posts: 3,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Edmund's First Drive: 2005 Mustang GT
Read this month's Motor Trend, the fucking AUTO GT puts down 267rwhp and 283rwtq. Great job Ford. The 5 speed auto GT runs the 1/4 in the 13.4-13.5 range and the 5 speed manual runs actually slower due to gear ratios at 13.6-13.7 range trapping around 100 in both. 0-60 in both is less than 5 seconds as well.