Civil Remedial Fees demise
01-17-2008, 03:22 PM
#1
ONE WAY --->
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 804/540/571
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Civil Remedial Fees demise
Let's hope these burdonsom, and constitutional violations are repealed. Though it won't take effect till July 1st, and the question of refunding thoes who have paid is still questioned by democrats on the board. Fairfax alone has assesed $13 Million in fees with $4.8 million collected as of December 31st. Currently, I'm faced with paying a $900 civil remedial fee under one of Virginias many statues, this one being 46.2-206.1 that took current action, with many residents refusing payment (leading to a revoked licence and warrant for arrest) while others write their congress men to support a bill of repeal. These fees are commonly x2 or even x3 the original violation fee. Personally I think these fees are rediculous, and a far-fetched cost to the common resident. Has any one else been faced with these fees? Whats your opinion? Do you support them being repealed or modified in any way?
01-18-2008, 03:20 AM
#4
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Yorktown
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Civil Remedial Fees demise
Let's hope these burdonsom, and constitutional violations are repealed. Though it won't take effect till July 1st, and the question of refunding thoes who have paid is still questioned by democrats on the board. Fairfax alone has assesed $13 Million in fees with $4.8 million collected as of December 31st. Currently, I'm faced with paying a $900 civil remedial fee under one of Virginias many statues, this one being 46.2-206.1 that took current action, with many residents refusing payment (leading to a revoked licence and warrant for arrest) while others write their congress men to support a bill of repeal. These fees are commonly x2 or even x3 the original violation fee. Personally I think these fees are rediculous, and a far-fetched cost to the common resident. Has any one else been faced with these fees? Whats your opinion? Do you support them being repealed or modified in any way?
01-19-2008, 09:07 AM
#6
PieceOfShitRedneck
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: hampton, virginia
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
01-19-2008, 09:27 AM
#7
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Civil Remedial Fees demise
I don't have a problem with these fines.
Why? You may ask?
Because I don't speed!
Why don't I speed? Because if I got one of these fines, I'd either 1) run. or 2) have to sell my car in order to pay them, hence why I would rather 1) run. BUT, I don't want to run, either, as for that can cause more severe consequences.
My solution: Don't speed!
Ohhh giggity.
Why? You may ask?
Because I don't speed!
Why don't I speed? Because if I got one of these fines, I'd either 1) run. or 2) have to sell my car in order to pay them, hence why I would rather 1) run. BUT, I don't want to run, either, as for that can cause more severe consequences.
My solution: Don't speed!
Ohhh giggity.
01-19-2008, 12:25 PM
#9
ONE WAY --->
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 804/540/571
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Civil Remedial Fees demise
I don't have a problem with these fines.
Why? You may ask?
Because I don't speed!
Why don't I speed? Because if I got one of these fines, I'd either 1) run. or 2) have to sell my car in order to pay them, hence why I would rather 1) run. BUT, I don't want to run, either, as for that can cause more severe consequences.
My solution: Don't speed!
Ohhh giggity.
Why? You may ask?
Because I don't speed!
Why don't I speed? Because if I got one of these fines, I'd either 1) run. or 2) have to sell my car in order to pay them, hence why I would rather 1) run. BUT, I don't want to run, either, as for that can cause more severe consequences.
My solution: Don't speed!
Ohhh giggity.
It's not only speeding that will net you this fee.
