WTF! Stealing from a local sick child!
If anyone sees these guys out and about. Contact the police and help get them off the street! These are the individuals who stole from Jonas Paras.
For more info on Jonas www.jonasparas.com
Thanks.
http://video.wtkr.com/global/video/f...n&rnd=95519890
For more info on Jonas www.jonasparas.com
Thanks.
http://video.wtkr.com/global/video/f...n&rnd=95519890
I'm speechless but at the same time wonder to myself that the sparkling wiggles party had time to be seated, served, eat, and leave and nobody noticed a big jar of money missing from the counter ?
I just made a small donation from the link and hope other people will also.
I just made a small donation from the link and hope other people will also.
There's a special spot in hell for those pieces of shit.
Side not: They need to remove money periodically to avoid these occurrences. 300 dollars just sitting there is unacceptable.
Side not: They need to remove money periodically to avoid these occurrences. 300 dollars just sitting there is unacceptable.
+1. Thats retarded. The funny thing is (if you can get something funny out of this) is that the kid probably earned 10X what was taken by the media exposure alone.
This may sound insensitive, but I don't see how this is any more or less morally wrong than stealing money from anyone else. Stealing is stealing, and this sick kid isn't any more of a victim than any other person. He's still a victim, he's just a victim who happens to be sick. People don't make huge news stories and offer to donate money to ordinary (non-sick) people who get robbed. If some guy living down by the James River Bridge gets mugged no one offers to help him out or send him money. As a human interest story, sick children may be more interesting, but as thieves these people are just as morally reprehensible regardless of who is robbed. It's just really sad that this child's unrelated health problems are what focus the attention on the crime committed here. This is why people in slums and ghettos complain that no one cares or notices when someone gets killed, but it's a multi-precinct task force investigation when someone in the rich neighborhood gets killed. It's the same thing here, the victim's situation is completely shifting people's perceptions of morality and legal punishment.
The slime that robbed this kid should get nailed to the wall not matter what, I just don't care who their victim was.
The slime that robbed this kid should get nailed to the wall not matter what, I just don't care who their victim was.
Last edited by Fabrik8; Mar 20, 2009 at 09:45 PM.
This may sound insensitive, but I don't see how this is any more or less morally wrong than stealing money from anyone else. Stealing is stealing, and this sick kid isn't any more of a victim than any other person. He's still a victim, he's just a victim who happens to be sick. People don't make huge news stories and offer to donate money to ordinary (non-sick) people who get robbed. If some guy living down by the James River Bridge gets mugged no one offers to help him out or send him money. As a human interest story, sick children may be more interesting, but as thieves these people are just as morally reprehensible regardless of who is robbed. It's just really sad that this child's unrelated health problems are what focus the attention on the crime committed here. This is why people in slums and ghettos complain that no one cares or notices when someone gets killed, but it's a multi-precinct task force investigation when someone in the rich neighborhood gets killed. It's the same thing here, the victim's situation is completely shifting people's perceptions of morality and legal punishment.
The slime that robbed this kid should get nailed to the wall not matter what, I just don't care who their victim was.
The slime that robbed this kid should get nailed to the wall not matter what, I just don't care who their victim was.





