GT-R is not a supercar

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Oct 7, 2008 | 11:25 AM

#31

Corey

Yup, jolly poopbuggy

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 15,600

Likes: 0

From: Hampton, VA

Re: GT-R is not a supercar

I'm about to make an OFFICIAL GTR thread. Every post will be re-directed there.

I'm not really making a thread...

Oct 7, 2008 | 11:25 AM

#32

JROW

S a D u B

Joined: Apr 2008

Posts: 6,990

Likes: 0

From: Harrisonburg, VA

Re: GT-R is not a supercar

Quote:

Originally Posted by STi_FTMFW

I get it now though, god forbid I come across some info about the most overhyped car ever made having mechanical problems I should not post anything about it and keep it to myself.

Lol. Seriously, the mechanical issues have been posted and talked about for a good month running now. You arn't posting anything new at all.

Oct 7, 2008 | 11:28 AM

#33

Junon

Bath salt trippin'

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 9,240

Likes: 0

From: Nova

Re: GT-R is not a supercar

Quote:

Originally Posted by Corey

^ Because they were overrated?

I really thought you still had the Evo.

Basically yeah haha. That and it took all the fun out of driving.

The Evo's been sold for a while. I had a silver FD for a while, then that was totalled, now I'm on my 2nd FD. :T

Oct 7, 2008 | 11:55 AM

#34

spitzbergen

Registered Member

Joined: Feb 2008

Posts: 277

Likes: 0

From: NOB

Re: GT-R is not a supercar

Quote:

Originally Posted by JROW

For the record. The zr-1 really rules.

Glass hoods are gay, the Viper ACR rules!

Oct 7, 2008 | 12:03 PM

#35

JROW

S a D u B

Joined: Apr 2008

Posts: 6,990

Likes: 0

From: Harrisonburg, VA

Re: GT-R is not a supercar

Quote:

Originally Posted by spitzbergen

Glass hoods are gay, the Viper ACR rules!

Ok. glass hoods are gay, and I love ACRs.

I'm so confused.

Oct 7, 2008 | 12:20 PM

#36

Silverbullet86

Registered Member

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts: 1,825

Likes: 0

From: 703 and 757

Re: GT-R is not a supercar

Quote:

Originally Posted by shutupandraceme

Maybe im biased cause im a Nissan guy but what cars are you comparing it to and what are u basing it on (styling, performance...etc)? Because in that price range, stock for stock not a lot of cars come close for another 100k. But its definetly no Bugatti Veyron

The 2009 CTS-V is compatible. They both do 0-60 in 3.5 seconds. Not bad considering the Caddy isn't AWD and is a 4 door.

Last edited by Silverbullet86; Oct 7, 2008 at 12:29 PM.

Oct 7, 2008 | 12:48 PM

#37

Hondas_Only

Do You Want More?

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts: 3,197

Likes: 0

From: Norfolk, Va

Re: GT-R is not a supercar

wow... maybe if your gonna buy a supercar you should learn how to launch on your beater first no?

Oct 7, 2008 | 12:54 PM

#38

ShawnD

Troll & Run

Joined: Sep 2007

Posts: 22,993

Likes: 0

From: Hampton Roads

Re: GT-R is not a supercar

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silverbullet86

The 2009 CTS-V is compatible. They both do 0-60 in 3.5 seconds. Not bad considering the Caddy isn't AWD and is a 4 door.

To bad the ugly nissans look better than the dumb cadilacs.

Oct 7, 2008 | 12:59 PM

#39

jpick_aap_cpp

CPL Us Army

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 7,003

Likes: 0

From: FREDERICKSBURG

Re: GT-R is not a supercar

Time to find another car to hate on, cause you cannot afford one, doesnt make it the worse production car, like many other once you've rode in one you will change you mind.

Thanks for wasting another thread on the GTR.

Oct 7, 2008 | 02:03 PM

#40

S2K_Guy

AKA: SHY_GUY

Joined: Dec 2004

Posts: 4,175

Likes: 0

Re: GT-R is not a supercar

A super-car is something ridiculously fast, ridiculously expensive, and incredibly rare. The GT-R isn't any of that. It's very fast, marginally expensive, and pretty rare. Like an F430. The GT-R is just something to let the real super-car people know they have to step-up their game. Like the NSX did in 91.

Reply Share

First
Prev
4 / 5
Next
Last