F/S: Taurus 9mm
Some people, well a lot, don't like the build quality of Taurus and apparently there has been issues with some models (not firing all the time, jamming, poor craftsmanship, etc). I believe a lot of this was older models, though there still are some reports of the same things, but past performance is hard to beat in the gun industry.
I would have no problem buying one and have been eyeing their new 1911 pretty hard.
I would have no problem buying one and have been eyeing their new 1911 pretty hard.
Well if i wen't buy the "handful" of reviews on glocks, i guess mine should have blown my hands off by now from chamber failure? The only issue ive heard of with Taurus, was the .40 24/7 pro had feeding issues, other then none. This is pretty much your personal oponion, and you tried to ruin his thread, shrug.
If i had the extra money, id buy it back from him, i loved it as my range gun, accurate, solid for the price, and cheap ammo.
If i had the extra money, id buy it back from him, i loved it as my range gun, accurate, solid for the price, and cheap ammo.
Well if i wen't buy the "handful" of reviews on glocks, i guess mine should have blown my hands off by now from chamber failure? The only issue ive heard of with Taurus, was the .40 24/7 pro had feeding issues, other then none. This is pretty much your personal oponion, and you tried to ruin his thread, shrug.
If i had the extra money, id buy it back from him, i loved it as my range gun, accurate, solid for the price, and cheap ammo.
If i had the extra money, id buy it back from him, i loved it as my range gun, accurate, solid for the price, and cheap ammo.
Last edited by RRR; May 19, 2008 at 04:37 PM.







