View Poll Results: Which is your choice for best and fun daily driver?
RSX type S



53
22.84%
SRT-4



30
12.93%
350Z



78
33.62%
RX-8



19
8.19%
OTHER



52
22.41%
Voters: 232. You may not vote on this poll
POLL: RSX, 350Z, RX-8, or SRT-4
If the bank will only give him the option of 48 months with anything $15k or lower, or up to 72 or 84 months on things up to $25k or whatever, then sure he can have a lower payment getting a newer/more expensive car, but he will also be paying more in interest and moving further into negative equity in the car paying the minimum payments. The shorter the life of the loan, the better chance that he will stay in positive equity to where if he ever NEEDED to sell the car asap, he wouldn't lose his ass trying to do so.
As for the 350z you posted, good price, but 135k miles is a lot, and that a lot of mileage for some to have beaten the balls out of the car. Also visit my350z.com if you are looking into 350z's, I would only buy 2004+, some of the earlier models experienced tranny problems, and it would be a bitch if you bought the car, and the transmission shit the bed a couple months later.
The RX-8, again seems like a good price depending on what the mileage he has on it is, but IMO the S2000 is much nicer, much easier to work on, reliability of a Honda, and very easy to upgrade or just maintain... plus in the event you need parts, sourcing S2000 parts would be much easier and cheaper.
350z hands down and I'm not just saying to be biast since I own one myself, I'm also saying it because I test drove s2000s, RSX-S, rx8s, all of these cars had one thing in common, NO TORQUE
the only car that kinda pushed me back to my seat was the s2000, and that was at like 5500 rpm. The Z is just an all around fast car, plenty of torque, both high and low end, looks great for it's price, I still remember people coming up to me asking me how much my car was and their reaction when I told I 'em it was a measly $28000 lol , they all thought it's a $50,000 car back in the day, but now they're pretty common and very cheap used, hence the reason I'm selling the Z for a viper.
Fantastic looks, good power for a stock car for it's price, phenomenal handling, and the car sounds amazing
Not to mention it's got one of the biggest market for aftermarket parts.
the only car that kinda pushed me back to my seat was the s2000, and that was at like 5500 rpm. The Z is just an all around fast car, plenty of torque, both high and low end, looks great for it's price, I still remember people coming up to me asking me how much my car was and their reaction when I told I 'em it was a measly $28000 lol , they all thought it's a $50,000 car back in the day, but now they're pretty common and very cheap used, hence the reason I'm selling the Z for a viper.
Fantastic looks, good power for a stock car for it's price, phenomenal handling, and the car sounds amazing

Not to mention it's got one of the biggest market for aftermarket parts.
on the s2k that push at 5500 sounds like vtec... and that 'push' is something i dont know that i want to live without... hence my lean to the rsx. im not really dying for a lot of torque... just something i can feel under my foot when i want to. ive heard that the Z is the gas guzzler of the bunch and so far it looks like the insurance quotes on it are pushing it out of my range as well...
I voted the 350, those motors have some really nice potential in stock form.
The RX-8 is the gas guzzler of the bunch. Go to some RX-8 forums and you'll see owners getting 20 mpg on the highway and as low as 15 in the city. Also RX-8s burn oil. When I went to the dealership to look at brand new RX-8s they recommend that I carry a quart of oil with me in the trunk and to check the oil level every other gas fill up. It's a great car to drive but there's a lot of maintenance. If you're set on an RX-8 get one with a factory warranty cause you won't know the maintenance record of a used car and rotary engines aren't exactly cheap and easy to service.
pretty good read. and reasonably comprehensive. thanks....
on the s2k that push at 5500 sounds like vtec... and that 'push' is something i dont know that i want to live without... hence my lean to the rsx. im not really dying for a lot of torque... just something i can feel under my foot when i want to. ive heard that the Z is the gas guzzler of the bunch and so far it looks like the insurance quotes on it are pushing it out of my range as well...
on the s2k that push at 5500 sounds like vtec... and that 'push' is something i dont know that i want to live without... hence my lean to the rsx. im not really dying for a lot of torque... just something i can feel under my foot when i want to. ive heard that the Z is the gas guzzler of the bunch and so far it looks like the insurance quotes on it are pushing it out of my range as well...
I wouldn't recommend getting a 350 with 136k miles on it. That's a little extreme. I'd stay in the 70-80k mile range if you want something you won't have to constantly work on.
RSX should be replaced by S2000 on your list...and the SRT-4 should be replaced by a STi or EVO...and as far as a reliable daily that is fun to drive I'd pick the S2000. Mainly because I've driven a 350Z and it felt like a plastic box that had a small hole for me to look out of the front in. I've ridden in a S2000 and it felt really good. I don't know anything about RX8s other then why waste your money on it...and the STi/Evo would nearly tie with the S2000 on my list.






