500WHP Evo or 500WHP S2000... whats cheaper?
Originally Posted by SHUT UP
my next car will be a 600whp evo
The Evo would be cheaper and the engine would be more reliable, but the S2000 with a spooled 33spline Ford 9" with some 4.11's would be more fun.
Originally Posted by Moriar
i think you suffer from poor comprehension, since i said an STI comes with more HP base (which means STOCK) then an EVO, and has MORE DISPLACEMENT then an EVO which MEANS MORE TORQUE, which MEANS MORE BALLS, which MEANS BETTER FOR ANY PURPOSE,
Last edited by Hybrid AWD; Jun 16, 2005 at 02:37 PM.
Originally Posted by Moriar
i have.. it wasnt fun, always worried about breakin down on the road, and sucked in the traffic that plagues NOVA 

yes this is true, but also how long has the 4g63 been around? almost what 15-17 years?
of course it would be easier to mod then the STI's motor which is less then 3 years old.
but i have driven both, and I prefer the STI, it felt like it had more Balls in Top end, and low end then the Evo, evo jus had less then the STI but that was it.
of course it would be easier to mod then the STI's motor which is less then 3 years old.
but i have driven both, and I prefer the STI, it felt like it had more Balls in Top end, and low end then the Evo, evo jus had less then the STI but that was it.
Originally Posted by Moriar
yeah i have a new rule, Street driven ='s 350whp or less, any more = Blue moon







