VADriven.com Forums

VADriven.com Forums (https://www.vadriven.com/forums/)
-   Automotive Discussion (https://www.vadriven.com/forums/automotive-discussion-8/)
-   -   OHC vs. OHV.... which is better? (https://www.vadriven.com/forums/automotive-discussion-8/ohc-vs-ohv-better-86851/)

Brock Obama 03-12-2005 11:06 AM

OHC vs. OHV.... which is better?
 
In this day in age, we have similair yet very different forms of the internal combustion engine. We all know both of them and have had many arguements about which is a better way to make power. I know that both I and Cobra4B have participated in such and in the Mustang F-body rivalry, its always getting brought up. :D Some of the negative aspects of a over head valve engine is that you can't have multiple intake and exhaust valves per cylinder and typically a lower red line, on the other side of the coin however, you'll have monsterous torque and simplicity. With a OHV engine, you have a higher redline, more simple design and typically a more efficient engine however torque is sometimes sacrifices with this kind of engine design and the heads are more complicated of its rival. So, I ask the people of dragva to post their two cents on what is a better engine design.....

Discuss :cool:

Lawlercaust 03-12-2005 11:21 AM

Re: OHC vs. OHV.... which is better?
 
No cams or valves, end of story. :p

Corey 03-12-2005 11:33 AM

Re: OHC vs. OHV.... which is better?
 

Originally Posted by XCELR8
Some of the negative aspects of a over head valve engine ...typically a lower red line...

and then you say:

Originally Posted by XCELR8
With a OHV engine, you have a higher redline

Which is it?

And besides, there is no way in hell there could be a VR6 with an internal cam. Engineers of that magnitude don't exist.

-Danimal 03-12-2005 11:44 AM

Re: OHC vs. OHV.... which is better?
 

Originally Posted by P-Money
No cams or valves, end of story. :p

:stupid: who needs um!

TRU 03-12-2005 11:50 AM

Re: OHC vs. OHV.... which is better?
 
I'll personally like both. Overhead Valve has more torque, and i like a car with lots of torque. Overhead Cams are nice, higher redline, better top end typically, but, not very street-able, unless your always on the highway. the teg im gettin is DOHC, so i guess ill have to keep the revs up, cause it has no torque :-p

Corey 03-12-2005 11:52 AM

Re: OHC vs. OHV.... which is better?
 

Originally Posted by TRU
the teg im gettin is DOHC, so i guess ill have to keep the revs up, cause it has no torque :-p

It has no torque because it's a honda not because it has over head cams.

TRU 03-12-2005 11:54 AM

Re: OHC vs. OHV.... which is better?
 
i know this, lol. but typically, OHC's have less torque than OHV's, which is my point. honda = torqueless wonder, no questions asked, lol

nothing. 03-12-2005 11:55 AM

Re: OHC vs. OHV.... which is better?
 

Originally Posted by WYT R1CE
:stupid: who needs um!

Your car has no rear interior and is not moving any time soon. :)

Corey 03-12-2005 11:57 AM

Re: OHC vs. OHV.... which is better?
 

Originally Posted by TRU
i know this, lol. but typically, OHC's have less torque than OHV's, which is my point. honda = torqueless wonder, no questions asked, lol

I was just giving ya hell. haha. I read in the rwd n/a thread that you like the torquey M3 engine. I was like "wait a second, that dude just said ohc engines weren't torquey". Haha.

I think a torquey car have nearly as much torque as hp, or more. So far, every "new" car I've owned as been "torquey". My honda wasn't torquey of course :D

shawn22 03-12-2005 12:36 PM

Re: OHC vs. OHV.... which is better?
 
OHC is a more efficient design, but OHV is more cost effective. Its all in what you choose, neither is better than the other.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:28 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands